ArticleNeurosurgical review2024
Comment on, "Expression of decitabine-targeted oncogenes in meningiomas in vivo".
Article in Neurosurgical review, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2025-01-31Computer-Aided Content or Computer-Generated Content · Investigation by Journal/Publisher ·
- Retracted
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The study by Canisius et al. (2022) explores the expression of decitabine-targeted oncogenes (TRIM58, FAM84B, ELOVL2, DIO3) in meningiomas, aiming to evaluate decitabine's therapeutic potential for high-grade tumors. Using immunohistochemical staining and RT-PCR in over 100 patient samples, the authors found significant correlations between oncogene expression and tumor grade, with elevated ELOVL2 levels being linked to tumor recurrence. This work highlights the role of decitabine in modulating oncogene expression and suggests its potential in treating refractory meningiomas. Despite the robust methodology, limitations such as the small sample size and the lack of comprehensive molecular data were noted. Future research should incorporate larger sample sizes and advanced genomic techniques like RNA sequencing to better understand oncogenic mechanisms. The study emphasizes the need for further in situ analyses of decitabine's efficacy, setting the foundation for future neuro-oncological treatments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39317826What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.