Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39317796›Full record

ArticleNature neuroscience2024

Single-cell m

Matthew Tegowski, Anna K Prater, Christopher L Holley, Kate D Meyer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature neuroscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. mNature reviews. Neuroscience · 2026
    Review
  6. Single-nucleotide RNA mCell reports · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Dual Roles of mCells · 2026
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. FTO-mediated mActa pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2026
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Loss of age-associated increase in mbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  20. Sequencing technologies to measure translation in single cells.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Matthew TegowskiDepartment of Biochemistry, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
Anna K PraterDepartment of Biochemistry, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
Christopher L HolleyDepartment of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2870-3352
Kate D MeyerDepartment of Biochemistry, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA. kate.meyer@duke.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7197-4054

Funding

Center for Multi-Scale Analysis of the Human EpitranscriptomeRM1HG011563 · NHGRI · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI SAMIE R JAFFREY, Kathryn D Meyer · 2021 to 2026
$22.2M
Epitranscriptomic Regulation of Synaptic Responses to Drugs of AbuseDP1DA046584 · NIDA · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI MEYER, KATHRYN D · 2018 to 2022
$2.4M
Mechanistic Insights into m6A-Mediated Regulation of Brain DevelopmentR01MH118366 · NIMH · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI MEYER, KATHRYN D · 2019 to 2023
$2.0M
NHGRI NIH HHS RM1 HG011563NIDA NIH HHS DP1 DA046584NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH118366U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI) RM1HG011563
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

N

Indexed as

AdenosineBrainSingle-Cell AnalysisAgingAnimalsMaleMethylationMiceMice, Inbred C57BLNeuronsRNA, MessengerTranscriptomeAdenosineN-methyladenosineRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID39317796
PMCPMC11614689

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.