Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39317794›Full record

ArticleNature human behaviour2024

Retraction Note: High replicability of newly discovered social-behavioural findings is achievable.

John Protzko, Jon Krosnick, Leif Nelson, Brian A Nosek, Jordan Axt, Matt Berent, Nicholas Buttrick, Matthew DeBell, Charles R Ebersole, Sebastian Lundmark and 7 more

Abstract readRetraction Notice
In one paragraph

Article in Nature human behaviour, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

John ProtzkoDepartment of Psychological & Brain Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, USA. protzko@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5710-8635
Jon KrosnickInstitute for Research in the Social Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Leif NelsonHaas School of Business, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Brian A NosekCenter for Open Science, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Jordan AxtDepartment of Psychology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3944-8331
Matt BerentMatt Berent Consulting, Sharon, PA, USA.
Nicholas ButtrickDepartment of Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Matthew DeBellInstitute for Research in the Social Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1126-1586
Charles R EbersoleDepartment of Psychology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Sebastian LundmarkSOM Institute, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4096-988X
Bo MacInnisInstitute for Research in the Social Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Michael O'DonnellMcDonough School of Business, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8953-3609
Hannah PerfectoOlin School of Business, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1121-3437
James E PustejovskyEducational Psychology Department, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0591-9465
Scott S RoederDarla Moore School of Business, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.
Jan WalleczekPhenoscience Laboratories, Berlin, Germany.
Jonathan W SchoolerDepartment of Psychological & Brain Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Identifiers

PMID39317794
PMCPMC11493675

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.