ArticleNeurosurgical review2024
Comment on, "Decoding pediatric spinal tumors: a single-center retrospective case series on etiology, presentation, therapeutic strategies, and outcomes".
Article in Neurosurgical review, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2025-01-31Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Computer-Aided Content or Computer-Generated Content ·
- Retracted
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The article "Decoding pediatric spinal tumors: a single-center retrospective case series on etiology, presentation, therapeutic strategies, and outcomes" by Lenga et al. (2024) provides essential insights into pediatric spinal tumors, a rare and challenging area of medical research. The authors present a thorough analysis of clinical presentations, treatment strategies, and patient outcomes, offering valuable data to refine therapeutic approaches and improve outcomes. However, the study's retrospective design, confined to a single center, introduces potential biases and limits the generalizability of findings. The lack of long-term follow-up data and a control group further restricts the study's scope. Future research should prioritize multi-center collaborations, incorporate control groups, and extend follow-up durations to better understand long-term outcomes. The establishment of standardized treatment protocols is also recommended to enhance consistency in managing pediatric spinal tumors across diverse clinical settings.
Identifiers
39317791What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.