Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39317790›Full record

ArticleNature ecology & evolution2024

Unexpected sustained soil carbon flux in response to simultaneous warming and nitrogen enrichment compared with single factors alone.

Melissa A Knorr, A R Contosta, E W Morrison, T J Muratore, M A Anthony, I Stoica, K M Geyer, M J Simpson, S D Frey

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature ecology & evolution, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Melissa A KnorrCenter for Soil Biogeochemistry and Microbial Ecology, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH, USA. mel.knorr@unh.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8365-7918
A R ContostaDepartment of Natural Resources and the Environment, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1201-1765
E W MorrisonDepartment of Natural Resources and the Environment, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9737-9947
T J MuratoreCenter for Soil Biogeochemistry and Microbial Ecology, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9464-1156
M A AnthonyCenter for Microbiology and Environmental Systems Science, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
I StoicaDepartment of Physical and Environmental Sciences and Environmental NMR Centre, University of Toronto Scarborough, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
K M GeyerDepartment of Environmental Science and Sustainability, Allegheny College, Meadville, PA, USA.
M J SimpsonDepartment of Physical and Environmental Sciences and Environmental NMR Centre, University of Toronto Scarborough, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8084-411X
S D FreyCenter for Soil Biogeochemistry and Microbial Ecology, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH, USA. serita.frey@unh.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9221-5919

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent observations document that long-term soil warming in a temperate deciduous forest leads to significant soil carbon loss, whereas chronic soil nitrogen enrichment leads to significant soil carbon gain. Most global change experiments like these are single factor, investigating the impacts of one stressor in isolation of others. Because warming and ecosystem nitrogen enrichment are happening concurrently in many parts of the world, we designed a field experiment to test how these two factors, alone and in combination, impact soil carbon cycling. Here, we show that long-term continuous soil warming or nitrogen enrichment when applied alone followed the predicted response, with warming resulting in significant soil carbon loss and nitrogen fertilization tending towards soil carbon gain. The combination treatment showed an unanticipated response, whereby soil respiratory carbon loss was significantly higher than either single factor alone, but without a concomitant decline in soil carbon storage. Observations suggest that when soils are exposed to both factors simultaneously, plant carbon inputs to the soil are enhanced, counterbalancing soil carbon loss and helping maintain soil carbon stocks near control levels. This has implications for both atmospheric CO

Indexed as

CarbonCarbon CycleNitrogenSoilClimate ChangeForestsGlobal WarmingCarbonNitrogenSoil

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.