ArticleDermatologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2024
[Drug therapy safety during pregnancy and breastfeeding].
Article in Dermatologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The treatment of dermatological diseases during pregnancy and breastfeeding poses particular challenges for the therapist for medical and legal reasons. Maternal and fetal influencing factors must be taken into account and the special need for protection of the fetus, infant, and mother must be considered in the treatment decision, usually outside of the approval process. Due to the lack of or insufficient evidence for most therapies during pregnancy and breastfeeding, an individual risk-benefit assessment should always be carried out, which also takes into account the risk of nontreatment. In the case of difficult or potentially momentous decisions, information from relevant databases, intercollegiate consultation and, if possible, advice from a clinical ethics committee should be obtained. In any case, the parents, and in particular the mother, should be carefully informed and their consent should be obtained and documented. Recommendations can be made for common chronic inflammatory and infectious dermatoses, but these should be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. For other therapy situations, an individual analysis and decision-making process is necessary. Overall, however, it can be stated that digital data processing and availability, combined with careful analysis, empathetic consideration and information for those affected, enables a successful treatment decision to be made in the vast majority of cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39317740What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.