Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39317658›Full record

Trial reportBritish journal of health psychology2025

Evaluating the Let's Move It intervention programme theory for adolescents' physical activity: Theorized psychosocial mechanisms of behavioural changes.

Minttu Palsola, Vera Araújo-Soares, Wendy Hardeman, Ari Haukkala, Matti Toivo Juhani Heino, Falko Sniehotta, Reijo Sund, Tommi Vasankari, Nelli Hankonen

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in British journal of health psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Minttu PalsolaFaculty of Social Sciences, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-9306-9992
Vera Araújo-SoaresDivision of Prevention, Center for Preventive Medicine and Digital Health (CPD), Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.
Wendy HardemanSchool of Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
Ari HaukkalaHelsinki Collegium for Advanced Studies, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Matti Toivo Juhani HeinoFaculty of Social Sciences, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
Falko SniehottaDivision of Prevention, Center for Preventive Medicine and Digital Health (CPD), Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.
Reijo SundUniversity of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
Tommi VasankariUKK Institute for Health Promotion Research, Tampere, Finland.
Nelli HankonenFaculty of Social Sciences, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.

Funding

Academy of Finland 285283Academy of Finland 304114Opetus- ja kulttuuriministeriö OKM/81/626/2014
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesBehaviour change theories have extensively been used in health behaviour change interventions and their programme theories. However, they are rarely evaluated in randomized field studies. The Let's Move It intervention targeted various psychosocial constructs to increase adolescents' physical activity. A theory-based process evaluation aiming to illuminate the trial findings as well as to test the programme theory used is conducted. Specifically, we investigate whether the intervention influenced the theorized determinants of change immediately post-intervention and after 1 year, and whether these determinants were associated with changes in physical activity.

designA cluster-randomized controlled trial (n = 1166).

methodsWe measured theorized determinants with self-report, and physical activity (PA) with accelerometry and self-report. The effects are evaluated with repeated measures ANOVA and regression models.

resultsNo changes were detected in most theorized determinants but intervention arm reported higher enactment of behaviour change techniques used during intervention immediately post-intervention and lower descriptive norms for PA throughout. Autonomous motivation was associated with PA immediately post-intervention.

conclusionsThe lack of intervention effects may be due to many factors, for example insensitive measures, ceiling effects. However, reporting these null effects advances understanding of behaviour change processes. We introduce methodologic possibilities for future intervention programme theory evaluation efforts.

Indexed as

ExerciseHealth BehaviorHealth PromotionAccelerometryAdolescentAdolescent BehaviorFemaleHumansMaleMotivationProgram EvaluationPsychological TheorySelf Reportbehaviour change technique enactmentintervention evaluationphysical activityprogramme theoryrandomized controlled trialreasoned action approachself‐determination theory

Identifiers

PMID39317658
PMCPMC11586702

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.