Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39317641›Full record

ReviewDrug testing and analysis2025

Skeletal Muscle Memory: An Update From the Antidoping Perspective.

Claire Traversa

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Drug testing and analysis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Claire TraversaWorld Anti-Doping Agency (WADA), Montreal, Quebec, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-7658-848X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This narrative review explores the concept of muscle memory, focusing on the physiological and biochemical mechanisms underlying information retention in skeletal muscle tissue as it relates to antidoping. The discussion encompasses the role of satellite cells (SCs) in myonuclei recruitment, resulting in increased myonuclear density and heightened muscle protein turnover. The myonuclear domain theory suggests that myonuclei acquired during hypertrophy may persist, contributing to enhanced muscle protein synthesis (MPS) and potential benefits of muscle memory. The impact of sustained training, protein intake, and resistance exercise on muscle memory, especially in elite athletes, is considered. The review also delves into the influence of anabolic androgenic steroids (AAS) on muscle tissue, highlighting their role in elevating the performance threshold and supporting recovery during intense training through increased muscle protein turnover rates. Additionally, genetic and epigenetic modifications, such as DNA methylation, are explored as potential contributors to muscle memory. The complex interplay of continuous training, AAS use, and genetic factors offers avenues for further research, especially in the context of antidoping efforts. The understanding of muscle memory has implications for maintaining performance gains and addressing ethical challenges in sports.

Indexed as

Doping in SportsMuscle, SkeletalAnabolic AgentsAnimalsHumansMuscle ProteinsResistance TrainingSatellite Cells, Skeletal MuscleAnabolic AgentsMuscle Proteinsanabolic androgenic steroidsantidopingdopingmuscle anabolismmuscle hypertrophymuscle memorymyonculei densitymyonuclear domain theorymyonuclei

Identifiers

PMID39317641
PMCPMC12209696

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.