ArticleBMJ open quality2024
Role of mixed healthcare providers networks in strengthening primary care systems: a case study of a rural primary care site.
Article in BMJ open quality, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pathways for enhancing service capability of primary healthcare institutions: a dynamic qualitative comparative analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Evaluation of patient satisfaction after primary care system interventions: a follow-up study.BMJ open quality · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionService delivery networks, also called healthcare providers networks (HCPNs) have been used to address health inequities and promote universal healthcare (UHC). This study described the effect of instituting a mixed HCPN (partnership of public health facilities with a private pharmacy) on the provision of medications in the rural primary care pilot site of the Philippine Primary Care Studies (PPCS).
methodsThis is a case study of the mixed HCPN in the PPCS rural site. A mixed HCPN involving one private pharmacy was instituted to increase the supply of drugs. The total number of medications prescribed per month from April 2019 to October 2021, and the number of medications dispensed from the public sector (rural health unit or RHU) and from the partner private pharmacy in the same time period were obtained.
resultsOf the 101 031 medications prescribed in the first year (April 2019 to March 2020), 21.7% were dispensed at the RHU and 66.7% were dispensed in the partner private pharmacy. The remaining 11.5% were unrendered or dispensed in other private pharmacies. Of the 35 408 medications prescribed in the second year (April 2020 to March 2021), 5.6% were dispensed at the RHU and 32.2% were dispensed at the partner private pharmacy. Majority (62.1%) were unrendered or dispensed in other private pharmacies. From April to October 2021, of the 6448 medications prescribed, 2.3% were dispensed at the RHU, and 47.3% were dispensed at the partner private pharmacy. Majority (50.3%) were unrendered or dispensed in other private pharmacies.
conclusionCreation of a mixed HCPN in a rural primary care site augmented access to essential medications. The mixed HCPN model in the study showed potential in strengthening access to consultations and medications in a rural community. Improving essential primary care services can facilitate implementation of UHC in the Philippines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.