Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39317468›Full record

ReviewBMJ global health2024

Human resources for health: a framework synthesis to put health workers at the centre of healthcare.

Ogonna N O Nwankwo, Christian Auer, Angela Oyo-Ita, John Eyers, Kaspar Wyss, Günther Fink, Xavier Bosch-Capblanch

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMJ global health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ogonna N O NwankwoSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Allschwil, Switzerland drogonnanwankwo@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9683-4920
Christian AuerSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Allschwil, Switzerland.
Angela Oyo-ItaDepartment of Community Medicine, University of Calabar, Calabar, Nigeria.
John Eyers3ie London, London, London, UK.
Kaspar WyssSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Allschwil, Switzerland.
Günther FinkSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Allschwil, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7525-3668
Xavier Bosch-CapblanchSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Allschwil, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4469-0395

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHuman resources are a key determinant for the quality of healthcare and health outcomes. Several human resource management approaches or practices have been proposed and implemented to better understand and address health workers' challenges with mixed results particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). The aim of this framework synthesis was to review the human resources frameworks commonly available to address human resources for health issues in LMIC.

methodsWe searched studies in Medline, Embase, CAB Global Health, CINAHL (EBSCO) and WHO global Index Medicus up to 2021. We included studies that provided frameworks to tackle human resources for health issues, especially for LMICs. We synthesised the findings using a framework and thematic synthesis methods.

resultsThe search identified 8574 studies, out of which 17 were included in our analysis. The common elements of different frameworks are (in descending order of frequency): (1) functional roles of health workers; (2) health workforce performance outcomes; (3) human resource management practises and levers; (4) health system outcomes; (5) contextual/cross-cutting issues; (6) population health outcomes and (7) the humanness of health workers. All frameworks directly or indirectly considered themes around the functional roles of health workers and on the outcomes of health workforce activities, while themes concerning the humanness of health workers were least represented. We propose a synthesised Human-Centred Health Workforce Framework.

conclusionsSeveral frameworks exist providing different recurring thematic areas for addressing human resources for health issues in LMIC. Frameworks have predominantly functional or instrumental dimensions and much less consideration of the humanness of health workers. The paradigms used in policy making, development and funding may compromise the effectiveness of strategies to address human resources challenges in LMIC. We propose a comprehensive human resources for health framework to address these pitfalls.

Indexed as

Developing CountriesHealth PersonnelDelivery of Health CareGlobal HealthHealth WorkforceHumansHealth policyHealth services researchHealth systemsSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID39317468
PMCPMC11429363

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.