ReviewBMJ global health2024
Human resources for health: a framework synthesis to put health workers at the centre of healthcare.
Review in BMJ global health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Does a paper-based information system based on a human-centred design (PHISICC) reduce the time needed for reporting health data in Nigeria?BMC health services research · 2026Trial
- Maternal Health Nurse Competency in Addressing Emergency Obstetric Care: An Assessment in Southern Mozambique.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2026Article
- Skills-Based Human Capital Management in Latvian University Hospitals: A Qualitative Multi-Institutional Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- From devolution to post-COVID-19 UHC scoping review of human resource for health reforms in Kenya: a signalling and sensemaking analysis.Frontiers in health services · 2026Article
- Governance pathways for scaling neonatal risk stratification tools in LMIC health systems: a multi-site qualitative study in Kenya.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- Role of digital health interventions in strengthening human resources for primary healthcare systems in India: A systematic review.Journal of education and health promotion · 2026Review
- Addressing Conceptual Gaps in Physician Leadership Development: A Critical Perspective.Journal of healthcare leadership · 2026Article
- From Research to Practice: Implementing an Evidence-Based Intervention for Nurse Well-Being in a Healthcare System.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- An integrated rehabilitation workforce within secondary healthcare in Pakistan: a qualitative study with physiotherapists.Health policy and planning · 2025Article
- Knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding metabolic associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) in elderly patients.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Addressing skilled birth attendants' needs of primary healthcare facilities in Nigeria using the human resources for health solutions model.Discover health systems · 2025Review
- Professional Commitment and Its Associated Factors Among Nurses in Public Hospitals of East Gojjam Zone, Northwest Ethiopia: A Cross-Sectional Study.SAGE open nursingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHuman resources are a key determinant for the quality of healthcare and health outcomes. Several human resource management approaches or practices have been proposed and implemented to better understand and address health workers' challenges with mixed results particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). The aim of this framework synthesis was to review the human resources frameworks commonly available to address human resources for health issues in LMIC.
methodsWe searched studies in Medline, Embase, CAB Global Health, CINAHL (EBSCO) and WHO global Index Medicus up to 2021. We included studies that provided frameworks to tackle human resources for health issues, especially for LMICs. We synthesised the findings using a framework and thematic synthesis methods.
resultsThe search identified 8574 studies, out of which 17 were included in our analysis. The common elements of different frameworks are (in descending order of frequency): (1) functional roles of health workers; (2) health workforce performance outcomes; (3) human resource management practises and levers; (4) health system outcomes; (5) contextual/cross-cutting issues; (6) population health outcomes and (7) the humanness of health workers. All frameworks directly or indirectly considered themes around the functional roles of health workers and on the outcomes of health workforce activities, while themes concerning the humanness of health workers were least represented. We propose a synthesised Human-Centred Health Workforce Framework.
conclusionsSeveral frameworks exist providing different recurring thematic areas for addressing human resources for health issues in LMIC. Frameworks have predominantly functional or instrumental dimensions and much less consideration of the humanness of health workers. The paradigms used in policy making, development and funding may compromise the effectiveness of strategies to address human resources challenges in LMIC. We propose a comprehensive human resources for health framework to address these pitfalls.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.