ReviewAnatomy & cell biology2024
Morphology and variations of middle cerebral artery: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Review in Anatomy & cell biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical Characteristics, Management, and Outcomes of Intracranial Hydatid Cysts in Pakistan: A Narrative Synthesis.Cureus · 2026Review
- Prevalence of basilar artery variants: a systematic review with meta-analysis of radiological studies.Neuroradiology · 2026Article
- Longitudinal sex differences in cerebrovascular ageing in older adults: results from the brain in motion study.The Journal of physiology · 2026Article
- Duplicate origin of the middle cerebral artery: a rare variant.Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA · 2025Article
- Concomitance of persistent primitive olfactory artery, accessory middle cerebral, and early bifurcated anterior cerebral arteries.Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To review morphometry, morphology, branching patterns and anomalies of middle cerebral artery (MCA). The databases of PubMed, Google Scholar and Scopus were searched with different keywords. The review comprised of 45 studies. Meta-analysis was done for dimensions of MCA, shapes, patterns and MCA anomalies. Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used for assessment of literature. Statistical analysis was done using R software using meta package. Thirteen research were combined to determine the proportion of MCA length and pooled proportion was 16.53 cm (15.33 to 17.72 cm); I
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.