ReviewRespiratory care2024
Optimal Postextubation Support in Critically Ill Patients: One Size Does Not Fit All.
Review in Respiratory care, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Extubation is a crucial step in the weaning process of critically ill mechanically ventilated patients. Some patients may develop postextubation respiratory failure that may lead to the need for re-intubation, which is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. This review comprehensively explores postextubation respiratory support strategies, focusing on the efficacy of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) oxygen therapy and noninvasive ventilation (NIV) in reducing re-intubation rates among various patient populations. HFNC improves oxygenation and reduces the work of breathing. However, its effectiveness in preventing re-intubation varies according to the patient's characteristics and the predefined risk for re-intubation. NIV, alternatively, appears to provide substantial advantages in reducing the rates of re-intubation and respiratory failure, especially in patients with obesity and patients with hypercapnia. Therefore, the indiscriminate application of these support strategies without consideration of individual patient characteristics may not improve outcomes, highlighting the need for careful patient selection and tailored therapeutic strategies based on specific risk factors and clinical conditions. By aligning postextubation respiratory support strategies with patient-specific needs, we may improve the success rates of extubation, enhance overall recovery, and reduce the burden of reintubations in the intensive care setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.