ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2025
Effect of Additional Roles Reimbursement Scheme roles on prescription patterns and patient satisfaction in England: a retrospective panel data analysis.
Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Consultation complexity and professionals consulted: a retrospective cohort study in English primary care.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn 2019, the Additional Roles Reimbursement Scheme (ARRS) was introduced in England as a crucial component of the government's manifesto pledge to enhance access to general practice. The primary objective was to recruit 26 000 extra personnel through new roles into general practice.
aimTo analyse the effects of ARRS staff on prescription rates and patient satisfaction. DESIGN AND
settingA retrospective panel data analysis combining data from the General Workforce Minimum Dataset and NHS Digital datasets about primary care practices and their activity from 2018 to 2022. The study included data from >6000 general practices.
methodA linear regression analysis was conducted to determine the association between ARRS staff and prescription rates and patient satisfaction, controlling for patient and practice characteristics.
resultsThe results showed that ARRS roles tend to be more frequent in larger general practices, with fewer full-time GPs per patient, and with more overseas trained GPs. The use of ARRS staff was significantly associated with lower prescription rates (β = -0.52,
conclusionThis study suggests that the ARRS has the potential to have a positive role in primary care, notably through reduced prescription rates and improved patient satisfaction. Further research is needed to explore the long-term effects of the ARRS on primary care, including patient outcomes and healthcare costs, and the potential barriers to its implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.