Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39317389›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2025

Experiences of integrating social prescribing link workers into primary care in England - bolting on, fitting in, or belonging: a realist evaluation.

Stephanie Tierney, Debra Westlake, Geoffrey Wong, Amadea Turk, Steven Markham, Jordan Gorenberg, Joanne Reeve, Caroline Mitchell, Kerryn Husk, Sabi Redwood and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Helping general practice find its groove again.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Stephanie TierneyNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford.ORCID 0000-0002-2155-2440
Debra WestlakeNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford.
Geoffrey WongNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford.
Amadea TurkNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford.
Steven MarkhamNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford.
Jordan GorenbergNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford.
Joanne ReeveHull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull.
Caroline MitchellSchool of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield, Sheffield.
Kerryn HuskPeninsula Medical School, University of Plymouth, Plymouth.
Sabi RedwoodBristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol.
Catherine PopeNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford.
Beccy BairdThe King's Fund, London.
Kamal Ram MahtaniNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFollowing the 2019 NHS Long Term Plan, link workers have been employed across primary care in England to deliver social prescribing.

aimTo understand and explain how the link worker role is being implemented in primary care in England. DESIGN AND

settingThis was a realist evaluation undertaken in England, focusing on link workers based in primary care.

methodThe study used focused ethnographies around seven link workers from different parts of England. As part of this, we interviewed 61 patients and 93 professionals from health care and the voluntary, community, and social enterprise sector. We reinterviewed 41 patients, seven link workers, and a link worker manager 9-12 months after their first interview.

resultsWe developed four concepts from the codes developed during the project on the topic around how link workers are integrated (or not) within primary care: (or not) within primary care: centralising or diffusing power; forging an identity in general practice; demonstrating effect; and building a facilitative infrastructure. These concepts informed the development of a programme theory around a continuum of integration of link workers into primary care - from being 'bolted on' to existing provision, without much consideration, to 'fitting in', shaping what is delivered to be accommodating, through to 'belonging', whereby they are accepted as a legitimate source of support, making a valued contribution to patients' broader wellbeing.

conclusionSocial prescribing was introduced into primary care to promote greater attention to the full range of factors affecting patients' health and wellbeing, beyond biomedicine. For that to happen, our analysis highlights the need for a whole-system approach to defining, delivering, and maintaining this new part of practice.

Indexed as

Primary Health CareSocial PrescribingEnglandFemaleHumansMaleQualitative ResearchState Medicinedelivery of health carelink workersprimary health carerealist evaluationsocial prescribing

Identifiers

PMID39317389
PMCPMC11800410

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.