ArticleBrain and language2024
Temporary ambiguity and memory for the context of spoken language in adults with moderate-severe traumatic brain injury.
Article in Brain and language, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Reduced temporal organization of narrative recall in adults with moderate-severe traumatic brain injury.Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Language is processed incrementally, with addressees considering multiple candidate interpretations as speech unfolds, supporting the retention of these candidate interpretations in memory. For example, after interpreting the utterance, "Click on the striped bag", listeners exhibit better memory for non-mentioned items in the context that were temporarily consistent with what was said (e.g., dotted bag), vs. not consistent (e.g., dotted tie), reflecting the encoding of linguistic context in memory. Here, we examine the impact of moderate-severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) on memory for the contexts of language use. Participants with moderate-severe TBI (N=71) and non-injured comparison participants (NC, N=85) interpreted temporarily ambiguous utterances in rich contexts. A subsequent memory test demonstrated that participants with TBI exhibited impaired memory for context items and an attenuated memory advantage for mentioned items compared to NC participants. Nonetheless, participants with TBI showed similar, although attenuated, patterns in memory for temporarily-activated items as NC participants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.