ArticleMMWR. Recommendations and reports : Morbidity and mortality weekly report. Recommendations and reports2024
CDC Program Evaluation Framework, 2024.
Article in MMWR. Recommendations and reports : Morbidity and mortality weekly report. Recommendations and reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Evaluating public health campaigns on health promotion, substance use prevention and physical activity: a systematic review.Health education research · 2026Pooled it
- Outcomes of a Program to Support Outpatient Antibiotic Adherence Among People Experiencing Housing Instability With Serious Injection Drug-Related Infections in Boston, MA: A Propensity Score Matched Study.Open forum infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Logic Models on Health Information Technology-Related Interventions: Scoping Review Across Disciplines.JMIR medical informatics · 2026Article
- Release of the English Version of China's Standards for Drinking Water Quality: Bridging Evidence and Global Health Equity.China CDC weekly · 2026Article
- Article
- Developing a Program Evaluation Training Within a National Federal Healthcare Setting: Veterans Affairs Evaluation Bootcamp Training.Learning health systems · 2026Article
- Hepatitis B virus testing, vaccination, and hepatitis B surface antigen prevalence among adult inpatients at an urban polyclinic in Accra, Ghana: a cross-sectional study.Infection prevention in practice · 2026Article
- Adapting a Youth Sexual Violence Prevention Logic Model and Evaluation to Asian American and Pacific Islander Youth in Iowa: a Case Study.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2026Article
- Building a relevant biomedical graduate program: from review to reform.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Awareness, Attitudes, and Behavioral Practices of the Population of the Republic of Kazakhstan Regarding Tuberculosis.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- An Evaluability Assessment of a School-Based Prevention Program: Promoting Evaluation Capacity Building.Justice evaluation journal · 2026Article
- A Practical Framework for the Creation of a National Mentorship Program Within the American Gastroenterological Association.Gastro hep advances · 2026Article
- Mining corridors as emergence interfaces: an evidence-informed one health operational framework for prevention of infectious disease outbreaks in Kédougou, Senegal.Frontiers in public health · 2026Review
- Generating meta-inferences for program improvement recommendations: mixed methods integration in joint displays for program evaluation.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- An evaluation of U.S. federal investments in newborn screening: successes, gaps, and future directions.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- A framework for evaluating implementation, impact, and cost-effectiveness of wastewater and environmental surveillance.Frontiers in public health · 2026Review
- Understanding the development and implementation of national quality of care and patient safety strategic documents: a scoping review.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Dissemination experiences and preferences from HIV service delivery organizations.Implementation science communications · 2025Article
- Ending publication bias: A values-based approach to surface null and negative results.PLoS biology · 2025Article
- Advancing methods for program evaluation in substance use by strengthening the application of epidemiology, economic evaluation, and implementation science: Reflections on the opportunities for synergy.Evaluation and program planning · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
29 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Program evaluation is a critical tool for understanding and improving organizational activities and systems. This report updates the 1999 CDC Framework for Program Evaluation in Public Health (CDC. Framework for program evaluation in public health. MMWR Recomm Rep 1999;48[No. RR-11];1-40) by integrating major advancements in the fields of evaluation and public health, lessons learned from practical applications of the original framework, and current Federal agency policies and practices. A practical, nonprescriptive tool, the updated 2024 framework is designed to summarize and organize essential elements of program evaluation, and can be applied at any level from individual programs to broader systems by novices and experts for planning and implementing an evaluation. Although many of the key aspects from the 1999 framework remain, certain key differences exist. For example, this updated framework also includes six steps that describe the general process of evaluation planning and implementation, but some content and step names have changed (e.g., the first step has been renamed Assess context). The standards for high-quality evaluation remain central to the framework, although they have been updated to the five Federal evaluation standards. The most substantial change from the 1999 framework is the addition of three cross-cutting actions that are core tenets to incorporate within each evaluation step: engage collaboratively, advance equity, and learn from and use insights. The 2024 framework provides a guide for designing and conducting evaluation across many topics within and outside of public health that anyone involved in program evaluation efforts can use alone or in conjunction with other evaluation approaches, tools, or methods to build evidence, understand programs, and refine evidence-based decision-making to improve all program outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.