Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39316616›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2024

Equity in the geographical distribution of general practitioners in Iran.

Farahnaz Khajehnasiri, Ali Mohammad Mosadeghrad, Mohammad Hossein Alibeiginejad

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Farahnaz KhajehnasiriDepartment of Community Medicine, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Ali Mohammad MosadeghradDepartment of Health Management, Policy and Economics, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mohammad Hossein AlibeiginejadMedical Student, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-0284-3747

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe equitable distribution of workforce is imperative for achieving public health goals. This study was conducted to evaluate the equity of the distribution of general practitioners (GPs) in Iran.

methodsIn this descriptive and cross-sectional study, data from the Information System of Benefits for Iranians and the Iranian Statistics Center were utilized. The study population encompasses all GPs operating in Iran in 2022. To assess equity in the geographical distribution of physicians, the Gini coefficient and Lorenz curve were calculated using Excel software. Additionally, ArcGIS software was used to create a distribution map.

resultsThe population of Iran and active GPs in 2022 were 85,874,000 and 67,852 respectively, resulting in an average of 7.9 active GPs per 10,000 people. The provinces of Yazd, Tehran, Mazandaran, and Fars exhibited the highest concentration of active GPs per capita, collectively representing more than 28% of the population and 37% of the active GPs. Fifty percent of the active GPs were women. The Gini coefficients for the provincial and intercity distributions of GPs were 0.08 and 0.2, respectively.

conclusionThe distribution of GPs among provinces and cities was deemed fair and relatively fair, respectively. Iran has a lower ratio of GPs per capita than the European nations. Policymakers should pay more attention to the implementation of appropriate policies with the aim of increasing equity in the geographical distribution of GPs in the country.

Identifiers

PMID39316616
PMCPMC11421784

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.