Observational studyPloS one2024
Evaluation of quadriceps muscle cross-sectional area using an ultrasonic diagnostic equipment with a wide field of view.
Observational study in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Validity and Sensitivity of Extended Field-of-View Wireless Palm-Sized Ultrasonography for Assessing Muscle Hypertrophy.European journal of sport science · 2026Article
- Towards Rapid Bedside Detection of Sarcopenia in Cancer Patients: The Role of Rectus Femoris Muscle Ultrasonography-A Prospective Cross-Sectional Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Evaluating upper leg muscle volume : the reliability of thigh circumference measurement 10 cm above the patella.Bone & joint research · 2025Article
- Usefulness of a newly developed ultrasonic system to estimate skeletal muscle mass and muscle strength in community-dwelling older adults.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Skeletal muscle index measurement via dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry or bioelectrical impedance analysis is used to evaluate muscle mass when diagnosing sarcopenia. However, inherent challenges exist with these methods. We previously focused on muscle mass evaluation in the quadriceps femoris by using computed tomography (CT). In this observational study, we utilized a new ultrasound device with a wide field of view that can obtain CT-like images and investigated its usefulness. Reproducibility was investigated by calculating the intra- and inter-examiner intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) by using three examiners and performing five measurements in 12 participants. In 123 participants (48 men, 75 women, mean age 78.2 ± 8.1 years), we investigated the correlation between the quadriceps cross-sectional area measured with supine ultrasound and CT images as well as between supine and sitting ultrasound images. Unadjusted, age-adjusted, and age-sex-adjusted correlations were calculated. Reproducibility was excellent (intra-examiner ICC[1,1]: 0.978, 0.987, and 0.994; inter-examiner ICC[2,1]: 0.993). The unadjusted, age-adjusted, and age-sex-adjusted correlations between the quadriceps cross-sectional area measured using supine ultrasound and CT were 0.949, 0.940, and 0.894, respectively. For sitting ultrasound, the corresponding values were 0.958, 0.953, and 0.912, respectively. Correlations between the supine and sitting ultrasound measurements were also good, with corresponding values of 0.952, 0.945, and 0.904, respectively. The tested ultrasound device showed excellent measurement reproducibility and had good correlations with CT images. Further studies with an increased numbers of clinical cases and additional evaluations should allow the device to become a screening tool for diagnosing sarcopenia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.