Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39316514›Full record

Observational studyInternational journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association2024

The mental and emotional status after radical cystectomy and different urinary diversion orthotopic bladder substitution versus external urinary diversion after radical cystectomy: A propensity score-matched study.

Giuseppe Palermo, Francesco Pio Bizzarri, Eros Scarciglia, Emilio Sacco, Koosha Moosavi Seyed, Pierluigi Russo, Filippo Gavi, Giovanni Battista Filomena, Francesco Rossi, Marco Campetella and 3 more

Abstract readObservational StudyComparative Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Giuseppe PalermoDepartment of Urology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Francesco Pio BizzarriDepartment of Urology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2119-9023
Eros ScarcigliaDepartment of Urology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Emilio SaccoCatholic University of Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy.
Koosha Moosavi SeyedDepartment of Urology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Pierluigi RussoDepartment of Urology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Filippo GaviDepartment of Urology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9994-4316
Giovanni Battista FilomenaDepartment of Urology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Francesco RossiDepartment of Urology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Marco CampetellaDepartment of Urology, Ospedale Isola Tiberina-Gemelli Isola, Rome, Italy.
Angelo TotaroDepartment of Urology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Nazario FoschiDepartment of Urology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Marco RacioppiDepartment of Urology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe quality of life in patients undergoing radical cystectomy and urinary diversion is gaining importance. Nowadays a broad consensus about the best urinary diversion does not exist. This study presents an all-round analysis of the impact of two types of urinary diversion on life's psycho-social aspects in patients undergoing radical cystectomy.

methodsThis is an observational, single-centre, prospective study. Eligible participants underwent radical cystectomy and urinary diversion for bladder cancer in our department from January 2020 and February 2024. Of 130 included patients, 90 (45 with Bricker's ureteroileocutaneostomy and 45 received orthotopic bladder replacement) patients were matched and the study groups were well balanced for the baseline-matched variables. Patients completed 4 questionnaires (EORTC QLQ-C30, PGWBI, HADS, PSQI) at three different times: before the surgical procedure, and at 3 and 12 months.

resultsTime shows a statistically significant effect (p < 0.0005) on four of the five functional scales explored (Physical Functioning, Role Functioning, Emotional Functioning, Social Functioning), and for all the nine symptoms/items' scales (p < 0.0005) and the Global Health Status (p = 0.003) in EORTC QLQ-C30. Neobladder's group shows a statistically significant improvement on the scales of Physical Functioning, Role Functioning, and Social Functioning, and for symptoms of nausea (p = 0.0027), pain (p = 0.0005), dyspnea (p = 0.012), insomnia (p = 0.004), constipation (p = 0.003).

conclusionWe do not find a better urinary diversion in absolute terms. Neobladder obtained better results only for specific items and features. The urinary diversion's choice must be made in concert by the patient, the caregiver, and health professionals with adequate counseling.

Indexed as

CystectomyPropensity ScoreQuality of LifeUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsUrinary DiversionAgedEmotionsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesSurveys and QuestionnairesUrinary Bladderbladder cancerorthotopic neobladderquality of lifeurinary diversion

Identifiers

PMID39316514
PMCPMC11618976

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.