Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39316418›Full record

ArticleJMIR medical informatics2024

Automated System to Capture Patient Symptoms From Multitype Japanese Clinical Texts: Retrospective Study.

Tomohiro Nishiyama, Ayane Yamaguchi, Peitao Han, Lis Weiji Kanashiro Pereira, Yuka Otsuki, Gabriel Herman Bernardim Andrade, Noriko Kudo, Shuntaro Yada, Shoko Wakamiya, Eiji Aramaki and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Tomohiro Nishiyama *Department of Information Science, Nara Institute of Science and Technology, Ikoma, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-1538-8266
Ayane Yamaguchi *Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-8530-8383
Peitao HanDepartment of Information Science, Nara Institute of Science and Technology, Ikoma, Japan.ORCID 0009-0009-2857-5483
Lis Weiji Kanashiro PereiraCenter for Information and Neural Networks, Advanced ICT Research Institute, Osaka, Japan.ORCID 0009-0009-7838-4917
Yuka OtsukiDepartment of Information Science, Nara Institute of Science and Technology, Ikoma, Japan.ORCID 0009-0005-0272-4111
Gabriel Herman Bernardim AndradeDepartment of Information Science, Nara Institute of Science and Technology, Ikoma, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-1950-8069
Noriko KudoDepartment of Information Science, Nara Institute of Science and Technology, Ikoma, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-7184-8146
Shuntaro YadaDepartment of Information Science, Nara Institute of Science and Technology, Ikoma, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-6209-1054
Shoko WakamiyaDepartment of Information Science, Nara Institute of Science and Technology, Ikoma, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-9371-1340
Eiji AramakiDepartment of Information Science, Nara Institute of Science and Technology, Ikoma, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-0201-3609
Masahiro TakadaGraduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-5954-1296
Masakazu ToiTokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Disease Center, Komagome Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-1488-9958

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNatural language processing (NLP) techniques can be used to analyze large amounts of electronic health record texts, which encompasses various types of patient information such as quality of life, effectiveness of treatments, and adverse drug event (ADE) signals. As different aspects of a patient's status are stored in different types of documents, we propose an NLP system capable of processing 6 types of documents: physician progress notes, discharge summaries, radiology reports, radioisotope reports, nursing records, and pharmacist progress notes.

objectiveThis study aimed to investigate the system's performance in detecting ADEs by evaluating the results from multitype texts. The main objective is to detect adverse events accurately using an NLP system.

methodsWe used data written in Japanese from 2289 patients with breast cancer, including medication data, physician progress notes, discharge summaries, radiology reports, radioisotope reports, nursing records, and pharmacist progress notes. Our system performs 3 processes: named entity recognition, normalization of symptoms, and aggregation of multiple types of documents from multiple patients. Among all patients with breast cancer, 103 and 112 with peripheral neuropathy (PN) received paclitaxel or docetaxel, respectively. We evaluate the utility of using multiple types of documents by correlation coefficient and regression analysis to compare their performance with each single type of document. All evaluations of detection rates with our system are performed 30 days after drug administration.

resultsOur system underestimates by 13.3 percentage points (74.0%-60.7%), as the incidence of paclitaxel-induced PN was 60.7%, compared with 74.0% in the previous research based on manual extraction. The Pearson correlation coefficient between the manual extraction and system results was 0.87 Although the pharmacist progress notes had the highest detection rate among each type of document, the rate did not match the performance using all documents. The estimated median duration of PN with paclitaxel was 92 days, whereas the previously reported median duration of PN with paclitaxel was 727 days. The number of events detected in each document was highest in the physician's progress notes, followed by the pharmacist's and nursing records.

conclusionsConsidering the inherent cost that requires constant monitoring of the patient's condition, such as the treatment of PN, our system has a significant advantage in that it can immediately estimate the treatment duration without fine-tuning a new NLP model. Leveraging multitype documents is better than using single-type documents to improve detection performance. Although the onset time estimation was relatively accurate, the duration might have been influenced by the length of the data follow-up period. The results suggest that our method using various types of data can detect more ADEs from clinical documents.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsNatural Language ProcessingBreast NeoplasmsDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsEast Asian PeopleFemaleHumansJapanRetrospective Studiesadverseadverse drug reactionadverse eventcancerdetectdetectingdetectiondrugdrugsEHREHRsmachine learningmedicationmedicationsMLnamed entity recognitionnatural language processingneuropathyNLPnotenotesoncologyperipheral neuropathypharmaceuticpharmaceuticalpharmaceuticalspharmaceuticspharmacologypharmacotherapyrecordrecordsreportreportssymptomsymptomstexttextstextual

Identifiers

PMID39316418
PMCPMC11462096

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.