Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39316298›Full record

ReviewPlanta2024

Plant developmental oddities.

Carlo M Pozzi, Vittoria F Brambilla, Angelo Gaiti, Alberto Spada

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Planta, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Carlo M PozziDepartment of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, University of Milan, Via Celoria 2, 20133, Milan, Italy.
Vittoria F BrambillaDepartment of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, University of Milan, Via Celoria 2, 20133, Milan, Italy.
Angelo GaitiDepartment of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, University of Milan, Via Celoria 2, 20133, Milan, Italy.
Alberto SpadaDepartment of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, University of Milan, Via Celoria 2, 20133, Milan, Italy. alberto.spada@unimi.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7665-0446

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

MAIN

conclusionPlants lacking shoot apical meristem develop with unique body shapes, suggesting rewiring of developmental genes. This loss of the meristem is likely influenced by a combination of environmental factors and evolutionary pressures. This study explores the development of plant bodies in three families (Podostemaceae, Lemnaceae, and Gesneriaceae) where the shoot apical meristem (SAM), a key structure for growth, is absent or altered. The review highlights alternative developmental strategies these plants employ. Also, we considered alternative reproduction in those species, namely through structures like turions, fronds, or modified leaves, bypassing the need for a SAM. Further, we report on studies based on the expression patterns of genes known to be involved in SAM formation and function. Interestingly, these genes are still present but expressed in atypical locations, suggesting a rewiring of developmental networks. Our view on the current literature and knowledge indicates that the loss or reduction of the SAM is driven by a combination of environmental pressures and evolutionary constraints, leading to these unique morphologies. Further research, also building on Next-Generation Sequencing, will be instrumental to explore the genetic basis for these adaptations and how environmental factors influence them.

Indexed as

MeristemBiological EvolutionGene Expression Regulation, PlantPlant DevelopmentPlant ShootsBauplanEvolutionary adaptationPhytomerPlant developmentSAM

Identifiers

PMID39316298
PMCPMC11422487

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.