ArticleOdontology2025
Finite element analysis of non-ultraviolet and ultraviolet-irradiated titanium implants.
Article in Odontology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimThe purpose of this study is to calculate von Mises stresses, von Mises strains, deformation, principal stresses and principal elastic strains of non-UV and UV-irradiated hybrid SLA (sandblasted, large-grit, acid-etched)-coated titanium implants. MATERIALS AND
methodsA cross-sectional analytical study was conducted at the Institute of Dentistry, CMH Lahore Medical College. Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) data of One Hundred and Thirty Eight Dio Hybrid sandblasted and acid-etched implants of identical dimensions (10 mm in length and 4.5 mm in diameter) were allocated in the three groups. Control group A samples were not given UV irradiation, while groups B and C were given UVA (382 nm, 25 mWcm
resultsThe control group exhibited the highest average values for maximum von Mises stress, von Mises strain, deformation, principal stress, and principal elastic strain in both the maxilla and mandible compared to the UV-irradiated groups. Additionally, these measures consistently displayed higher averages in the maxilla across all groups compared to the mandible. Particularly, the UVC-irradiated group demonstrated the lowest von Mises stresses around the implants compared to the UVA group.
conclusionInsignificant differences were observed between UVA- and UVC-irradiated implants in terms of principal stress, deformation, von Mises strain, and principal elastic strain. The only notable distinction was in von Mises stress, where the UVC-irradiated group exhibited lower von Mises stress around SLA-coated titanium implants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39316234What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.