Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39316181›Full record

ArticleChirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)2024

[Anastomotic leakage following surgical resection in the upper gastrointestinal tract].

Felix Berlth, Dörte Wichmann, Stefano Fusco, André Mihaljevic

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Felix BerlthKlinik für Allgemein‑, Viszeral- und Transplantationschirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Eberhard Karls Universität, Hoppe-Seyler-Straße 3, 72076, Tübingen, Deutschland. felix.berlth@med.uni-tuebingen.de.
Dörte WichmannKlinik für Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie und Infektiologie und Geriatrie, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Eberhard Karls Universität, Tübingen, Deutschland.
Stefano FuscoKlinik für Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie und Infektiologie und Geriatrie, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Eberhard Karls Universität, Tübingen, Deutschland.
André MihaljevicKlinik für Allgemein‑, Viszeral- und Transplantationschirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Eberhard Karls Universität, Hoppe-Seyler-Straße 3, 72076, Tübingen, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Surgical resection is the consistent component of curative treatment strategies for primary malignant diseases of the stomach and the esophagus. The placement of anastomoses for the necessary reconstruction still accounts for substantial morbidity and in the case of a failure to rescue also for mortality, especially for esophagojejunostomy and esophagogastrostomy. The diagnostics of anastomotic leakage routinely involve computed tomography and endoscopy and timely performance appears to be essential. Endoscopy can simultaneously initiate the essential treatment step. A major reason for the improvement of postoperative outcomes after resection in the upper gastrointestinal tract in the last decades is the successful and mostly endoscopically performed management of anastomotic leakage, whereby different endoscopic treatment options are now available. Endoscopic vacuum therapy has become established as the standard, normally with an endoscopic vacuum sponge technique but is also now supplemented by a combination system of vacuum sponge and stent. Furthermore, a foil-coated multiple lumen nasogastric tube represents another available option, which can possibly especially be used as a prophylactic measure. The longest established endoscopic therapy option for anastomotic leaks, the endoluminal metal stent, has been replaced as the standard by the vacuum treatment but is still used in suitable situations. Additionally, there are endoscopic suture devices that are currently only used very occasionally. Surgical revision is always available as treatment escalation but is only recommended for very early occurrences and possibly technically related anastomotic leakage and in the case of failure of endoscopic treatment. This article describes and summarizes the diagnostics and treatment of anastomotic leakages after surgical procedures of the upper gastrointestinal tract.

Indexed as

Anastomotic LeakAnastomosis, SurgicalEndoscopy, GastrointestinalEsophageal NeoplasmsEsophagectomyHumansPostoperative ComplicationsReoperationStentsStomach NeoplasmsUpper Gastrointestinal TractEndoluminal metal stentsEndoscopyEsophagectomyGastrectomyVacuum therapy

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.