SynthesisClinical neuroradiology2024
Comprehensive Evaluation of Serpentine Aneurysms: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis with a Subanalysis for Treatment Approaches.
Synthesis in Clinical neuroradiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Short to mid-term outcomes of flow re-direction endoluminal device X (FREDDiagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey) · 2026Pooled it
- Giant serpentine aneurysm: Imaging features including potential diagnostic utility of arterial spin labeling.Radiology case reports · 2026Article
- Giant dissecting aneurysm of the middle cerebral artery (MCA): report of four cases-successfully treated by microsuture technique.Neurosurgical review · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to systematically evaluate and enhance the understanding of optimal management strategies for serpentine aneurysms.
methodsA systematic search was conducted in Medline, Scopus, and Cochrane databases up to July 8, 2024, using relevant keywords. Studies included were case series, prospective or retrospective cohorts, or randomized controlled trials with data on clinical and angiographic outcomes of intracranial serpentine aneurysms. Data extraction and quality assessment were performed independently by two authors. Statistical analysis was conducted using R, with pooled estimates under a random-effects model.
resultsTen studies comprising 70 patients with 71 serpentine aneurysms were included. The majority (92.9%) were giant aneurysms. The overall rate of procedure-related complications was 33%, morbidity was 13%, and mortality was 13%. Good neurological outcomes were achieved in 76% of cases. For unruptured aneurysms, the complication rate was 34%, while no complications were observed in ruptured aneurysms. Comparative analysis between ruptured and unruptured aneurysms showed no significant differences in outcomes or complications. The technical success rate was 91%. Reconstructive methods showed a slightly higher rate of good neurological outcomes (77%) compared to deconstructive methods (70%), though complication rates were similar.
conclusionBoth reconstructive and deconstructive endovascular treatments for serpentine aneurysms are effective, with high rates of good neurological outcomes and acceptable complication rates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39316117What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.