ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2024
Adherence to Non-Antibiotic Prophylactic Regimens in Women with Recurrent Urinary Tract Infections.
Article in International urogynecology journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Unraveling the vaginal microbiota-based etiology of recurrent cystitis: the potential role ofTherapeutic advances in urologyReview
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introduction and hypothesisNon-antibiotic regimens such as methenamine hippurate, D-mannose, and vaginal estrogen are often prescribed as prevention for recurrent urinary tract infections (rUTIs). The objective of our study was to describe adherence rates in women prescribed non-antibiotic prophylaxis for rUTI and to explore factors associated with adherence.
methodsThis was an ambispective cohort study describing and comparing adherence to non-antibiotic prophylactic regimens for rUTIs. Adult women who sought care from a Urogynecology clinic at a tertiary care center for rUTIs or frequent UTIs between January 2020 and December 2021 were included if they were prescribed a non-antibiotic prophylactic regimen. The Medication Adherence Questionnaire (MAQ) was administered to all eligible patients prospectively and then their charts were reviewed retrospectively for demographic and clinical factors. A score of 0 on the MAQ defined medication adherence. Any score ≥ 1 defined medication non-adherence.
resultsA total of 90 patients met the inclusion criteria and completed the MAQ, with 33 (37%) in the adherent group and 57 (63%) in the non-adherent group. Mean age was 64.7 (± 14.7) years. Vaginal estrogen (81.1%) was the most commonly prescribed prophylactic regimen, followed by methenamine hippurate (26.7%). 73.3% of patients met criteria for rUTI at the index visit as per the American Urogynecologic Society best-practice statement. No demographic or clinical factors were associated with adherence to non-antibiotic prophylactic regimens.
conclusionsNon-antibiotic prophylactic rUTI regimens are commonly prescribed; however, adherence remains low at 37%. There were no predictors associated with patient compliance. Clinicians should therefore inquire about adherence prior to escalating treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39316113What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.