ReviewPathologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2025
[Histopathological diagnostics for assessment questions of tendo-, ligamento-, and meniscus pathologies].
Review in Pathologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This review article presents the possibilities and limitations of histopathological diagnostics on the issues of joint diseases, including in the context of the medical insurance inquiries, which consider the important articular, non-osseous compartments, especially of the tendons, ligaments, and meniscus. Essential for expert assessments is the causal clarification of whether the continuity disruption has been induced exogenously by trauma or endogenously based on tissue that is functionally impaired and thus degeneratively altered. The degree of degeneration/texture disorder is determined by means of the degeneration-score, which is set in a semiquantitative, three-stage grading. Grades 1 and 2 are summed up as low-grade degeneration and compared to grade 3, high-grade degeneration. Age determination of continuity disruption is based on the assessment of the morphology of discontinuity and on the assessment of hemosiderin deposits. The tasks of histopathological diagnostics thus consist of the detection and grading of textural disorder (degeneration), the determination of the histopathologic age of existing continuity disruptions, and particularly the diagnosis of clinically/radiologically undiagnosed diseases, which may be relevant for pathogenesis. In the case of contradictory diagnoses from different diagnostic disciplines and in the case of imprecise and potentially even contradictory patient information, purely legal, judicial decisions may be necessary. In this case the legally binding assessment within the framework of legal evidence evaluation then arises.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39316075What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.