Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39316050›Full record

Observational studyProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2024

Monitoring surgical nociception using multisensor physiological models.

Sandya Subramanian, Bryan Tseng, Marcela Del Carmen, Annekathryn Goodman, Douglas M Dahl, Riccardo Barbieri, Emery N Brown

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sandya SubramanianHarvard-Massachusetts Institute of Technology Division of Health Sciences and Technology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139.ORCID 0000-0001-5885-1199
Bryan TsengPicower Institute of Learning and Memory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139.
Marcela Del CarmenMassachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114.
Annekathryn GoodmanMassachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114.ORCID 0000-0002-7227-0902
Douglas M DahlMassachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114.ORCID 0000-0002-9084-9627
Riccardo BarbieriDepartment of Electronics, Information and Bioengineering, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy 20133.
Emery N BrownHarvard-Massachusetts Institute of Technology Division of Health Sciences and Technology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139.ORCID 0000-0003-2668-7819

Funding

Training Program in NeuroengineeringT32EB003383 · NIBIB · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI NITISH VYOMESH THAKOR · 2004 to 2026
$6.5M
George J. Elbaum (MIT '59, SM '63, PhD '67), Mimi Jensen, Diane B. Greene (MIT, SM '78), Mendel Rosenblum, Bill Swanson, Cathy and Lou Paglia Anesthesia Research Initiative FundJPB Foundation (JPBF) PIIF VIIMIT Office of Graduate Education Collamore-Rogers FellowshipNIBIB NIH HHS T32 EB003383NSF | NSF Graduate Research Fellowship Program (GRFP) GRFPPicower Institute for Learning and Memory PIIF VII
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Monitoring nociception, the flow of information associated with harmful stimuli through the nervous system even during unconsciousness, is critical for proper anesthesia care during surgery. Currently, this is done by tracking heart rate and blood pressure by eye. Monitoring objectively a patient's nociceptive state remains a challenge, causing drugs to often be over- or underdosed intraoperatively. Inefficient management of surgical nociception may lead to more complex postoperative pain management and side effects such as postoperative cognitive dysfunction, particularly in elderly patients. We collected a comprehensive and multisensor prospective observational dataset focused on surgical nociception (101 surgeries, 18,582 min, and 49,878 nociceptive stimuli), including annotations of all nociceptive stimuli occurring during surgery and medications administered. Using this dataset, we developed indices of autonomic nervous system activity based on physiologically and statistically rigorous point process representations of cardiac action potentials and sweat gland activity. Next, we constructed highly interpretable supervised and unsupervised models with appropriate inductive biases that quantify surgical nociception throughout surgery. Our models track nociceptive stimuli more accurately than existing nociception monitors. We also demonstrate that the characterizing signature of nociception learned by our models resembles the known physiology of the response to pain. Our work represents an important step toward objective multisensor physiology-based markers of surgical nociception. These markers are derived from an in-depth characterization of nociception as measured during surgery itself rather than using other experimental models as surrogates for surgical nociception.

Indexed as

NociceptionAgedAutonomic Nervous SystemFemaleHeart RateHumansMaleModels, BiologicalMonitoring, IntraoperativePostoperative PainProspective Studiesanesthesiaautonomic nervous systemmultimodalpoint processsurgical nociception

Identifiers

PMID39316050
PMCPMC11459174

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.