Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39316034›Full record

ArticleSexually transmitted diseases2025

Acceptability of Doxycycline Prophylaxis, Prior Antibiotic Use, and Knowledge of Antimicrobial Resistance Among Australian Gay and Bisexual Men and Nonbinary People.

Martin Holt, Benjamin R Bavinton, Sarah K Calabrese, Timothy R Broady, Shawn Clackett, Vincent J Cornelisse, Simin Yu, Tina Gordon, Dash Heath-Paynter, John B F de Wit and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sexually transmitted diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Martin HoltFrom the Centre for Social Research in Health.ORCID 0000-0002-2586-8274
Benjamin R BavintonThe Kirby Institute, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5834-8278
Sarah K CalabreseORCID 0000-0003-2640-0208
Timothy R BroadyFrom the Centre for Social Research in Health.ORCID 0000-0002-4341-1868
Shawn ClackettNew South Wales Ministry of Health, Sydney.ORCID 0000-0002-8088-8446
Vincent J CornelisseORCID 0000-0003-0657-9677
Simin YuFrom the Centre for Social Research in Health.ORCID 0000-0003-2910-8712
Tina GordonNew South Wales Ministry of Health, Sydney.
Dash Heath-PaynterHealth Equity Matters, Sydney, Australia.
John B F de WitDepartment of Interdisciplinary Social Science, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5895-7935
James MacGibbonFrom the Centre for Social Research in Health.ORCID 0000-0002-1359-9572

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is growing interest in novel sexually transmissible infection (STI) prevention strategies, including doxycycline postexposure prophylaxis (doxy-PEP). We assessed interest in doxy-PEP and other STI prevention strategies among gay and bisexual men and nonbinary people in Australia, as well as prior antibiotic use for STI prevention, and knowledge of antimicrobial resistance (AMR).

methodsWe conducted a national, online survey in June to July 2023. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with the acceptability of doxy-PEP.

resultsOf 2046 participants, 26.9% had been diagnosed with an STI in the previous year. Condoms were rated as an acceptable STI prevention strategy by 45.1% of the sample, STI preexposure prophylaxis by 54.0%, and doxy-PEP by 75.8%. Previous antibiotic use for STI prevention was reported by 7.5% of the sample, and 2.6% were currently using antibiotics for STI prevention. Over half the sample (62.1%) had some knowledge of AMR. Of those who knew something about AMR, 76.2% were concerned about it. Interest in using doxy-PEP was independently associated with previous use of antibiotics for STI prevention (adjusted odds ratio, 3.09; 95% confidence interval, 1.78-5.35; P < 0.001), whereas those who were concerned about AMR were less interested in it (adjusted odds ratio, 0.51; 95% confidence interval, 0.36-0.72; P < 0.001).

conclusionsDoxycycline postexposure prophylaxis was highly acceptable to gay and bisexual men and nonbinary people in Australia, and few factors distinguished between interest in using it or not. We recommend community and professional discussion and education about the effective use of doxy-PEP, AMR, and who would most benefit from doxy-PEP.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsDoxycyclineHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHomosexuality, MalePatient Acceptance of Health CareSexual and Gender MinoritiesSexually Transmitted DiseasesAdolescentAdultAustraliaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPost-Exposure ProphylaxisSurveys and QuestionnairesAnti-Bacterial AgentsDoxycycline

Identifiers

PMID39316034
PMCPMC11723483

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.