ArticleAutophagy2025
Were the autophagosome-lysosome/vacuole fusion models illustrated correctly in the literature?
Article in Autophagy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Knowns and Unknowns of Membrane Features and Changes During Autophagosome-Lysosome/Vacuole Fusion.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Exploration of autophagy in different species has become a hotspot in cell biology in the past decades. Macroautophagy (hereafter, autophagy) is the most widely studied type. One of the hallmarks of autophagy is the fusion of the outer membrane (OM) of a closed double-membrane mature autophagosome (AP) with the lysosomal/vacuolar single membrane. Most researchers in the autophagy field agree upon this description. However, AP-lysosome/vacuole fusion models that do not follow this description frequently appear in the literature, even published in some prestigious journals until now. Some of the misrepresented models are from autophagy laboratories with brilliant publication records. These flaws should be addressed as a public announcement in the autophagy field to avoid spreading misinformation. The editors and reviewers are the guardians to ensure correct models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.