ArticleThe Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy2024
Model-based translation of results from in vitro to in vivo experiments for afabicin activity against Staphylococcus aureus.
Article in The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- A mechanism-based model of immune status effects on antibiotic PK/PD targets in bacteremia.Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics · 2026Article
- ComparativeAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2026Article
- Model-based quantification of immune response and anti-staphylococcal activity of afabicin in immunocompetent mouse thigh infections to enable predictions of clinical efficacy.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2026Article
- Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling to evaluate the relative impact of immune response and meropenem on bacterial killingAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2026Article
- Exploiting Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Methods for Optimizing and Accelerating Drug Development of Innovative Anti-Infectives.ChemMedChem · 2026Review
- Model-based translation of the PKPD-relationship for linezolid and vancomycin on methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: from in vitro time-kill experiments to a mouse pneumonia model.The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy · 2025Article
- Simulation-based evaluation of the impact of dose fractionation study design on antibiotic PKPD analyses.JAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTranslation of experimental data on antibiotic activity typically relies on pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) indices. Model-based approaches, considering the full antibiotic killing time course, could be an alternative.
objectivesTo develop a mechanism-based modelling framework to assess the in vitro and in vivo activity of the FabI inhibitor antibiotic afabicin, and explore the ability of a model built on in vitro data to predict in vivo outcome.
methodsA PK/PD model was built to describe bacterial counts from 162 static in vitro time-kill curves evaluating the effect of afabicin desphosphono, the active moiety of the prodrug afabicin, against 21 Staphylococcus aureus strains. Combined with a mouse PK model, outcomes of afabicin doses of 0.011-190 mg/kg q6h against nine S. aureus strains in a murine thigh infection model were predicted, and thereafter refined by estimating PD parameters.
resultsA sigmoid Emax model, with EC50 scaled by the MIC described the afabicin desphosphono killing in vitro. This model predicted, without parameter re-estimation, the in vivo bacterial counts at 24 h within a ±1 log margin for most dosing groups. When parameters were allowed to be estimated, EC50 was 38%-45% lower in vivo, compared with in vitro, within the studied MIC range.
conclusionsThe developed PK/PD model described the time course of afabicin activity across experimental conditions and bacterial strains. This model showed translational capacity as parameters estimated on in vitro time-kill data could well predict the in vivo outcome for a wide variety of doses in a mouse thigh infection model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.