Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39315385›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet regional health. Southeast Asia2024

Economic burden of suicide deaths in India (2019): a retrospective, cross-sectional study.

Anukrati Nigam, Madhurima Vuddemarry, Siddhesh Zadey

Expression of concernAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet regional health. Southeast Asia, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It carries an expression of concern. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Anukrati NigamAssociation for Socially Applicable Research, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Madhurima VuddemarryAssociation for Socially Applicable Research, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Siddhesh ZadeyAssociation for Socially Applicable Research, Pune, Maharashtra, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: India has the highest number of suicide deaths in the world. Suicide prevention requires policy attention and resource allocation. Evidence of economic losses due to disease burden can influence such allocations. We assessed the economic burden and its distribution across states and demographic groups in India. Methods: We used the human capital approach in this retrospective cross-sectional analysis to assess the economic burden of suicide in India for the year 2019 for 28 Indian states and 3 union territories (UTs). We calculated the monetary value for the years of life lost disaggregated by states, age groups, and sexes. For sensitivity, we present a library of estimates using different discount rates, life expectancy thresholds, and estimates specific to the populations that can participate in the workforce. Findings: The national economic burden of suicide was US$ 16,749,079,455 (95% Uncertainty Interval: 11,913,034,910-22,404,233,468). The top three states, Karnataka, Tamil Nadu, and Maharashtra, contributed to 44.82% of the total burden in India. The age group 20-34 years had the largest suicide burden and contributed to 53.05% of the overall national economic burden (US$ 8,885,436,385 [6,493,912,818-11,694,138,884]). Twenty states and UTs had a greater economic burden for females than males. Interpretation: The current analysis ascertains a high economic burden of suicide among the Indian youth and females, necessitating concerted multisectoral efforts and immediate investments. Funding: None.

Indexed as

Health economicsHuman capital approachIndiaSuicide

Identifiers

PMID39315385
PMCPMC11417197

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.