Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39315342›Full record

ArticlePhysics and imaging in radiation oncology2024

Cherenkov imaging combined with scintillation dosimetry provides real-time positional and dose monitoring for radiotherapy patients with cardiac implanted electronic devices.

Savannah M Decker, Allison L Matous, Rongxiao Zhang, David J Gladstone, Evan K Grove, Benjamin B Williams, Michael Jermyn, Shauna McVorran, Lesley A Jarvis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physics and imaging in radiation oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Savannah M DeckerThayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755, United States.
Allison L MatousRadiation Oncology, Dartmouth Cancer Center, Dartmouth-Health, Lebanon, NH 03765, United States.
Rongxiao ZhangThayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755, United States.
David J GladstoneThayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755, United States.
Evan K GroveHeart and Vascular Center Dartmouth-Health, Lebanon, NH 03765, United States.
Benjamin B WilliamsRadiation Oncology, Dartmouth Cancer Center, Dartmouth-Health, Lebanon, NH 03765, United States.
Michael JermynThayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755, United States.
Shauna McVorranRadiation Oncology, Dartmouth Cancer Center, Dartmouth-Health, Lebanon, NH 03765, United States.
Lesley A JarvisRadiation Oncology, Dartmouth Cancer Center, Dartmouth-Health, Lebanon, NH 03765, United States.

Funding

Translational Engineering in Cancer (TEC)P30CA023108 · NCI · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI Steven D Leach · 1985 to 2026
$91.3M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA023108
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and purpose: Cardiac implanted electronic devices (CIED) require dose monitoring during each fraction of radiotherapy, which can be time consuming and may have delayed read-out times. This study explores the potential of Cherenkov imaging combined with scintillation dosimetry as an alternative verification system. Methods and materials: Time-gated, complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor (iCMOS) cameras were used to collect video images of anthropomorphic phantoms and patients undergoing radiation treatment near chest wall cardiac devices. Scintillator discs and optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters (OSLDs) were used for dose measurement. Accuracy of spatial delivery was assessed by overlaying predicted surface dose outlines derived from the treatment planning system (TPS) with the Cherenkov images. Dose measurements from OSLDs and scintillators were compared. Results: In phantom studies, Cherenkov images visibly indicated when dose was delivered to the CIED as compared to non-overlapping dose deliveries. Comparison with dose overlays revealed congruence at the planned position and non-congruence when the phantom was shifted from the initial position. Absolute doses derived from scintillator discs aligned well with the OSLD measurements and TPS predictions for three different positions, measuring within 10 % for in-field positions and within 5 % for out-of-field positions. For two patients with CIEDs imaged over 18 fractions, Cherenkov imaging confirmed positional accuracy for all fractions, and dose measured by scintillator discs deviated by <0.015 Gy from the OSLD measurements. Conclusions: Cherenkov imaging combined with scintillation dosimetry presents an alternative methodology for CIED monitoring with the added benefit of instantly detecting deviations, enabling timely corrective actions or proper patient triage.

Indexed as

Breast cancerCardiac implanted electronic devicesCherenkov imagingDefibrillatorsPacemakersRadiotherapyScintillation dosimetry

Identifiers

PMID39315342
PMCPMC11417574

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.