ArticleBio-protocol2024
FixNCut: A Practical Guide to Sample Preservation by Reversible Fixation for Single Cell Assays.
Article in Bio-protocol, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- RNA-aware tissue preservation workflows for high-quality spatial transcriptomics.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The quality of standard single-cell experiments often depends on the immediate processing of cells or tissues post-harvest to preserve fragile and vulnerable cell populations, unless the samples are adequately fixed and stored. Despite the recent rise in popularity of probe-based and aldehyde-fixed RNA assays, these methods face limitations in species and target availability and are not suitable for immunoprofiling or assessing chromatin accessibility. Recently, a reversible fixation strategy known as FixNCut has been successfully deployed to separate sampling from downstream applications in a reproducible and robust manner, avoiding stress or necrosis-related artifacts. In this article, we present an optimized and robust practical guide to the FixNCut protocol to aid the end-to-end adaptation of this versatile method. This protocol not only decouples tissue or cell harvesting from single-cell assays but also enables a flexible and decentralized workflow that unlocks the potential for single-cell analysis as well as unconventional study designs that were previously considered unfeasible. Key features • Reversible fixation: Preserves cellular and molecular structures with the option to later reverse the fixation for downstream applications, maintaining cell integrity • Compatibility with single-cell assays: Supports single-cell genomic assays such as scRNA-seq and ATAC-seq, essential for high-resolution analysis of cell function and gene expression • Flexibility in sample handling: Allows immediate fixation post-collection, decoupling sample processing from analysis, beneficial in settings where immediate processing is impractical • Preservation of RNA and DNA integrity: Effectively preserves RNA and DNA, reducing degradation to ensure accurate transcriptomic and genomic profiling • Suitability for various biological samples: Applicable to a wide range of biological samples, including tissues and cell suspensions, whether freshly isolated or post-dissociated • Enables multi-center studies: Facilitates collaborative research across multiple centers by allowing sample fixation at the point of collection, enhancing research scale and diversity • Avoidance of artifacts: Minimizes stress or necrosis-related artifacts, preserving the natural cellular physiology for accurate genomic and transcriptomic analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.