ArticleHeliyon2024
Exergetic investigation of the influence of injector location in HCCI engines utilizing DEE as pilot fuel and biogas as primary fuel.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To address the global demand for sustainable energy, integrating biogas into internal combustion engines is becoming more important. Homogeneous Charge Compression Ignition (HCCI) engines, known for high efficiency and low emissions, offer a promising solution. This study investigates the optimal injector location for using biogas in HCCI engines, with diethyl ether (DEE) as the pilot fuel, evaluating three positions: (i) at the port, (ii) 6 cm away (Manifold 1), and (iii) 10 cm away (Manifold 2). Through experiments and simulations, the impact of injector location on engine performance is analyzed across various parameters, including methane fractions, engine loads, and exhaust gas compositions. Results show that port injection achieves the highest first law and exergy efficiencies but increases emissions of hydrocarbons (HC), carbon monoxide (CO), and smoke. At 15 Nm load, Manifold 1 shows a 27.34 % reduction in exergy efficiency compared to port injection, while Manifold 2 exhibits an 18.49 % decrease at higher loads. Despite lower efficiencies, Manifold 1 effectively reduces harmful emissions. The study also considers exergo-economic and sustainability aspects, highlighting that while port injection is optimal for efficiency, Manifold 1 excels in minimizing HC and CO emissions, with a 50 % reduction in HC and 71.43 % reduction in CO emissions at 15 Nm load compared to port injection. Manifold 2 achieves the lowest smoke emissions across all loads. This investigation provides crucial insights into optimizing HCCI engines for biogas utilization, emphasizing injector location, fuel composition, and operating parameters to enhance performance and reduce environmental impact.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.