ArticleHeliyon2024
Effect of selective preservatives on shelf-life of guava juice extracted using pectinase enzyme.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Fruit-Vegetable-Herb Blend-Based Polyphenol-Rich Food Powder: Physicochemical, Functional, Antioxidant, and Sensory Evaluation.International journal of food science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The study investigated the feasibility of enzymatic extraction for guava juice and evaluated the effects of various preservatives on its shelf life. The crushed guava puree was undergone different pectinase enzyme concentrations over three incubation periods. The findings revealed that pectinase concentrations of 0.1 % and 0.2 %, when incubated for 1 and 2 h, were the most effective. Juice yields ranged from 65.24 % to 78.64 %, with Total Soluble Solids (TSS) varying from 9.12°Brix to 11.56°Brix. The physicochemical properties of the guava juice resulted 84.2 % moisture, 2.16 % protein, 0.77 % fat, 3.27 % fiber, 0.65 % acidity, 2.25 % reducing sugars, 8.27 % non-reducing sugars, 79.53 % antioxidant activity, 173.2 mg/100g of ascorbic acid, 10.52 TSS, 109.7 mg/100g of phenolic content, and a pH of 3.2. Eight juice samples were prepared as per formulation with sodium benzoate and potassium metabisulfite (KMS) at concentrations of 150 ppm, 200 ppm, and 250 ppm, in addition to one refrigerated sample and one control. The stability of these guava juice samples was monitored every 15 days over a 90-day period. Results showed that acidity, TSS, pH, reducing sugars, and non-reducing sugars changed over time. Samples with preservatives exhibited slower changes compared to the control. Phenolic compounds diminished more quickly at ambient temperature than in refrigerated or preservative-treated samples. Initially, phenolic content and antioxidant capacity were 44 mg GAE/100g and 44 %, respectively, but declined to 10-15 mg and 15-17 % by the end of the storage period. Color changes were more noticeable in samples stored at room temperature, whereas preservatives effectively reduced color degradation caused by enzymatic browning. Moreover, ascorbic acid retention was better in samples with preservatives and those stored under refrigeration. The ascorbic acid degradation rate was highest at room temperature (0.023 day^-1) and lowest with 250 ppm KMS (0.016 day^-1). Microbiological tests indicated that the juice remained safe for 40 days at room temperature, 90 days under refrigeration, and approximately 85 days with preservatives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.