ArticleHeliyon2024
How attentive is a student in class? A concentration evaluation method based on head Euler angle.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
How attentive is a student in class? It is an interesting and challenging question in the field of education research. In this paper, a concentration evaluation method based on head Euler angle is proposed. First, a fine large-small-interval video sampling strategy is advocated and concepts of dynamic threshold and action amplitude coefficient are defined, which are fused together to get the head up rate. Second, head front-facing rate is computed through analyzing the yaw angle, which is obtained from a proposed spatial physical model of camera and student seat position. Third, for any given time period, class concentration of a student is derived by fusing and normalizing the head up rate and head front-facing rate based on Euclidean-distance. Finally, accuracy experiments are conducted, where the proposed method achieves an average accuracy of 89.8% compared with the average score from the questionnaire given by 22 reviewers. Also, robust experiments on several head pose estimation models are facilitated, which achieves an average accuracy of 98.43% on recorded video dataset, indicates insensitivity to the head pose estimation model used for data collection and verifies that the proposed method is independent on any specific head pose estimation model. The experimental results show that the proposed method is accurate, effective and robust for the concentration evaluation in class.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.