ArticleHeliyon2024
Identification of diagnostic markers and molecular clusters of cuproptosis-related genes in alcohol-related liver disease based on machine learning and experimental validation.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and aims: Alcohol-related liver disease (ALD) is a worldwide burden. Cuproptosis has been shown to play a key role in the development of several diseases. However, the role and mechanisms of cuproptosis in ALD remain unclear. Methods: The RNA-sequencing data of ALD liver samples were downloaded from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database. Bioinformatical analyses were performed using the R data package. We then identified key genes through multiple machine learning methods. Immunoinfiltration analyses were used to identify different immune cells in ALD patients and controls. The expression levels of key genes were further verified. Results: We identified three key cuproptosis-related genes (CRGs) (DPYD, SLC31A1, and DBT) through an in-depth analysis of two GEO datasets, including 28 ALD samples and eight control samples. The area under the curve (AUC) value of these three genes combined in determining ALD was 1.0. In the external datasets, the three key genes had AUC values as high as 1.0 and 0.917, respectively. Nomogram, decision curve, and calibration curve analyses also confirmed these genes' ability to predict the diagnosis. These three key genes were found to be involved in multiple pathways associated with ALD progression. We confirmed the mRNA expression of these three key genes in mouse ALD liver samples. Regarding immune cell infiltration, the numbers of B cells, CD8 (+) T cells, NK cells, T-helper cells, and Th1 cells were significantly lower in ALD patient samples than in control liver samples. Single sample gene set enrichment analysis (ssGSEA) was then used to estimate the immune microenvironment of different CRG clusters and CRG-related gene clusters. In addition, we calculated CRG scores through principal component analysis (PCA) and selected Sankey plots to represent the correlation between CRG clusters, gene clusters, and CRG scores. Finally, the three key genes were confirmed in mouse ALD liver samples and liver cells treated with ethanol. Conclusions: We first established a prognostic model for ALD based on 3 CRGs and robust prediction efficacy was confirmed. Our investigation contributes to a comprehensive understanding of the role of cuproptosis in ALD, presenting promising avenues for the exploration of therapeutic strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.