Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39315111›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2024

Cost-effectiveness of first-line enfortumab vedotin in addition to pembrolizumab for metastatic urothelial carcinoma in the United States.

Andong Li, Meiyu Wu, Ouyang Xie, Heng Xiang, Kehui Meng, Chongqing Tan, Long Wang, Xiaomin Wan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Advances in the management of localized bladder cancers.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Andong LiDepartment of Pharmacy, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Meiyu WuDepartment of Pharmacy, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Ouyang XieDepartment of Pharmacy, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Heng XiangDepartment of Pharmacy, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Kehui MengDepartment of Pharmacy, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Chongqing TanDepartment of Pharmacy, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Long WangDepartment of Urology, The Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Xiaomin WanDepartment of Pharmacy, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and objective: The EV-302 trial found that the combination of enfortumab vedotin (EV) with pembrolizumab significantly improved survival for patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC). However, given the high cost of the drugs, there is a need to assess its value by considering both efficacy and cost. This study assessed the cost-effectiveness of EV plus pembrolizumab as a first-line treatment for patients with mUC from the perspective of U.S. payers. Methods: A Markov model was developed to compare the lifetime costs and effectiveness of EV in combination with pembrolizumab with chemotherapy in the treatment of mUC patients from U.S. payer perspective. Life-years (LYs), quality-adjusted LYs (QALYs), and lifetime costs were estimated. One-way, two-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted to evaluate model uncertainty. Additionally, subgroup analyses were performed. Results: Compared to chemotherapy, the combination of EV and pembrolizumab provided an additional 2.10 LYs and 1.72 QALYs, at an incremental cost of $962,240.8 per patient. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) is $558,973 per QALY. Subgroup analysis indicated that patients ineligible for cisplatin treatment had a lower ICER compared to those who were eligible for cisplatin. Conclusions: From the perspective of US payers, at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $150,000 per QALY, the combination of EV and pembrolizumab is estimated to not be cost-effective compared to traditional chemotherapy in the first-line treatment of mUC patients.

Indexed as

Antibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCost-Benefit AnalysisQuality-Adjusted Life YearsAgedCarcinoma, Transitional CellFemaleHumansMaleMarkov ChainsMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisUnited StatesUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsUrologic NeoplasmsAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, Humanizedenfortumab vedotinpembrolizumabbladder cancercost-effectivenessenfortumab vedotinpembrolizumabthe United States

Identifiers

PMID39315111
PMCPMC11416998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.