Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39315072›Full record

ArticleHealth psychology and behavioral medicine2024

Supporting General Practitioners and people with hypertension to maximise medication use to control blood pressure: the contribution of Collective Intelligence to the development of the 'Maximising Adherence, Minimising Inertia' (MIAMI) intervention.

Eimear C Morrissey, Owen M Harney, Michael J Hogan, Patrick J Murphy, Louise O'Grady, Molly Byrne, Monica Casey, Sinead Duane, Hannah Durand, Peter Hayes and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health psychology and behavioral medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Eimear C MorrisseySchool of Psychology, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland.
Owen M HarneySchool of Psychology, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland.
Michael J HoganSchool of Psychology, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland.
Patrick J MurphyHRB Primary Care Clinical Trials Network Ireland, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland.
Louise O'GradySchool of Psychology, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland.
Molly ByrneSchool of Psychology, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland.
Monica CaseySchool of Medicine, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
Sinead DuaneJ.E. Cairnes School of Business and Economics, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland.
Hannah DurandDivision of Psychology, University of Stirling, Stirling, United Kingdom.
Peter HayesSchool of Medicine, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
Caroline McDevittMIAMI PPI Panel, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland.
Denis MocklerMIAMI PPI Panel, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland.
Martin MurphyMIAMI PPI Panel, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland.
Patrick TowersMIAMI PPI Panel, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland.
Andrew W MurphyHRB Primary Care Clinical Trials Network Ireland, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland.
Gerard J MolloySchool of Psychology, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Hypertension remains one of the most important modifiable risk factors for stroke and heart disease. Anti-hypertensive medications are effective, but are often not used to maximum benefit. Sub-optimal dosing by prescribers and challenges with medication-taking for patients remain barriers to effective blood pressure control. Objectives: We aimed to systematically develop a theory-based complex intervention to support General Practitioners (GPs) and people with hypertension to maximise medication use to control blood pressure. Methods: We used the three-phase Behaviour Change Wheel (BCW) as the overarching intervention development framework. Collective Intelligence methodology was used to operationalise the stakeholder input to Phases 2 and 3 of the BCW. This took the form of a Collective Intelligence workshop with 19 stakeholders from diverse backgrounds including lived experience, general practice, nursing, pharmacy and health psychology. Techniques such as barrier identification, idea-writing and scenario-based design were used to generate possible intervention options. Intervention options were then selected and refined using the Acceptability, Practicability, Effectiveness, Affordability, Side-effects and Equity (APEASE) criteria and guidance from the MIAMI Public and Patient Involvement Panel. Results: The finalised MIAMI intervention consists of both GP and patient supports. GP supports include a 30-minute online training, information booklet and consultation guide (drop-down menu) embedded within the patient electronic health system. Patient supports include a pre-consultation plan, website, and a structured GP consultation with results from an Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitor and urine chemical adherence test. The intervention components have been mapped to the intervention functions of the BCW and Behaviour Change Technique Ontology. Conclusion: Collective Intelligence offered a novel method to operationalise stakeholder input to Phases 2 and 3 of the BCW. The MIAMI intervention is now at pilot evaluation stage.

Indexed as

behaviour change wheelcollective intelligencecomplex interventionHypertensionintervention developmentSDG 3: Good health and well-being

Identifiers

PMID39315072
PMCPMC11418048

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.