ArticleGlobal epidemiology2024
Improving the timeliness of birth registration in Fiji through a financial incentive.
Article in Global epidemiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Fiji is a Pacific Island nation with the predominant ethnic groups indigenous Fijians (iTaukei) (62 %) and Fijians of Indian descent (31 %). This study reports on the effect of a Parental Assistance Payment Program (PAPP) tied to on-time birth registration, available in Fiji from August 2018 to July 2020. Methods: Unit record birth registration data ( Results: During the PAPP, mean birth-to-registration intervals declined sharply by 81 %, from 665 days (95 %CI: 658-671) to 124 days (121-127). The largest declines were among i-Taukei children (803 to 139 days, 83 %) compared to non-iTaukei (283 to 76 days, 73 %); mothers aged 10-19 years (880 to 134 days, 85 %) compared to ≥20 years (653 to 123 days, 81 %); and single mothers (983 to 145 days, 85 %) compared to married mothers (570 to 115 days, 80 %). On-time birth registration increased from 57 % to 93 %, and the adjusted hazard ratio showed children born during the PAPP were 2.3 times more likely (95 %CI: 2.2-2.4) to have their birth registered on-time compared to children born before the PAPP. When the PAPP was discontinued in August 2020, the birth-to-registration interval increased sharply in all population groups. Conclusions: During the two-year period the PAPP was available, it was highly effective at improving the timeliness of birth registration, particularly among iTaukei children, young mothers, and single mothers. After the PAPP was discontinued, the timeliness of birth registration deteriorated sharply. Longer post-PAPP follow-up time (≠5 years) is required to determine whether the timeliness of birth registration has deteriorated to levels similar to those during the pre-PAPP period.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.