ArticleJournal of pediatrics. Clinical practice2024
The Performance of Critical Congenital Heart Disease Screening in Rural Versus Urban Locations in the Northwest United States.
Article in Journal of pediatrics. Clinical practice, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Emergency criteria and lifesaving intervention windows for high-risk critical congenital heart disease: a perspectives.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- [Expert consensus on the diagnosis and treatment of common neonatal diseases in primary healthcare institutions: congenital heart disease (2025)].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2025Article
- Pulse Oximetry-Based Critical Congenital Heart Disease Screening and Its Differential Performance in Rural America.Journal of pediatrics. Clinical practice · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Pulse oximetry screening of newborns detects critical congenital heart disease (CCHD). Rural birth location is known to affect timing and management of when infants with CHD undergo surgery, but its association with CCHD screening is unknown. We assess the relationship between rural location and postnatal CCHD diagnosis and describe lesion-specific modes of diagnosis. Study design: Data were abstracted from medical records at 2 cardiac surgery centers in Washington state. Infants with CCHD, defined as CHD requiring either cardiac intervention or resulting in death at <1 month of age, born between July 2015 and June 2020, were included and classified by method of identification. Patient home ZIP codes were used to determine rural location. Results: We included 561 newborns with CCHD; 35% were diagnosed postnatally. Predominant postnatal mechanisms of identification (n = 194) included symptomatic before CCHD screening period (56%), CCHD screening (22%), and symptomatic after false-negative screen (15%). Postnatal diagnosis rate increased with degree of ruralness (48% in small rural/isolated regions vs 32% in urban regions; Conclusions: CCHD screening identifies 22% of postnatally diagnosed CCHD and 7% of cases overall in our region. Postnatal diagnosis is more common in rural regions. The incidence of undiagnosed CCHD at birth increases with decreasing nursery levels. This study supports the value of CCHD screening in routine newborn care, especially in rural areas and hospitals with lower nursery levels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.