Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39314995›Full record

ArticleContemporary clinical trials communications2024

The impact of internet connectivity when conducting a virtual clinical trial with participants living in rural areas.

Diane E Holland, Catherine E Vanderboom, Jay Mandrekar, William S Harmsen, Allison M Gustavson, Brystana G Kaufman, Ann Marie Dose, Ellen M Wild, Cory Ingram, Joan M Griffin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Contemporary clinical trials communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Recruitment strategies for community-based pharmacy research.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Diane E HollandKern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Catherine E VanderboomKern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Jay MandrekarDivision of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
William S HarmsenDivision of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Allison M GustavsonCenter for Care Delivery & Outcomes Research, Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Brystana G KaufmanPopulation Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
Ann Marie DoseKern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Ellen M WildDepartment of Community Internal Medicine Geriatrics, and Palliative Care Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN, USA.
Cory IngramDepartment of Community Internal Medicine Geriatrics, and Palliative Care Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN, USA.
Joan M GriffinKern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

Funding

Women's Cancer ProgramP30CA015083 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI AKHILESH PANDEY · 1985 to 2026
$151.3M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA015083
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim: The purpose of this secondary analysis was to describe issues related to internet connections during a virtual randomized clinical trial (v-RCT) that included family caregiver participants living in rural areas. Background: Success of v-RCTs depends on reliable, high-quality internet access, which can be problematic in rural areas. Methods: Interventionists documented connectivity issues and corrections made to address connectivity in a narrative note after each virtual visit with family caregivers enrolled in a v-RCT. Notes were reviewed for descriptions of the internet connection during the visit and then coded into those with and without connectivity problems. Two investigators reviewed notes and codes to assure reliability. Discrepancies in codes were discussed or arbitrated by a third investigator until consensus was reached. Analysis was completed using descriptive statistics. Results: Of the 1003 visits reviewed, only 11 % of visits (115/1003) contained a documented problem with internet connectivity. Visits with documented connectivity problems were experienced by 27 % of participants (58/215). However, 60 % (35/58) of participants with a documented issue had a problem with only one visit. None of the participants withdrew from the v-RCT due to problems with their internet connections. Conclusions: The findings support the effective use of virtual visits in research involving participants living in rural locations. V-RCTs provide a strategy that enables participation for individuals who may not otherwise have access to clinical trials conducted in-person in urban settings. Utilizing internet access to connect with and support people who live in rural areas is critically needed to advance clinical research.

Indexed as

Family caregivingInternetPalliative careRural/underservedVirtual clinical trials

Identifiers

PMID39314995
PMCPMC11416646

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.