Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39314988›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic advances in drug safety2024

Impact of different doses of esketamine on the incidence of hypotension in propofol-based sedation for colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial.

Mengyue Fu, Bo Sheng, Rui Liu, Yongjie Li, Guizhen Chen, Hai Chen, Xuehan Chen, Guangyou Duan, He Huang, Jie Chen and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic advances in drug safety, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Mengyue FuDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Bo ShengDepartment of Gastroenterology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Rui LiuDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Yongjie LiDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Guizhen ChenDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Hai ChenDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Xuehan ChenDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Guangyou DuanDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
He HuangDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Jie ChenDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400010, China.
Yuanjing ChenDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400010, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-3141-5239

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Hypovolemia is common in colonoscopy due to fasting and bowel preparation, and propofol itself can reduce systemic vascular resistance, resulting in relative hypovolemia. Therefore, hypotension is not a rare event during propofol-based sedation for colonoscopy. Objectives: Our objective was to explore the efficacy of esketamine as a sedative adjuvant in reducing the incidence of hypotension during colonoscopy. Design: This was a prospective randomized trial. The trial was registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ID: ChiCTR 2100047032). Methods: We included 100 eligible patients who planned to receive a colonoscopy and randomly divided them into 4 groups with 25 patients in each group, which were propofol 2 mg/kg (Group P), propofol 1 mg/kg with esketamine 0.2 mg/kg (Group E1), propofol 1 mg/kg with esketamine 0.3 mg/kg (Group E2), and propofol 1 mg/kg with esketamine 0.4 mg/kg (Group E3). The hemodynamic and respiratory parameters were documented at various times during the procedure, including the patient's entry into the endoscopic room (T0), the induction of sedation (T1), the insertion of the colonoscope (T2), the removal of the colonoscope (T3), and the awakening of the patient (T4). The primary outcome was the incidence of hypotension. Secondary outcomes were cardiovascular side effects other than hypotension, incidence of hypoxia, cumulative changes in cardiovascular and respiratory parameters, total propofol dosage, anesthesia recovery time, and satisfactory levels of both patients and endoscopists. Results: The incidence of hypotension in Group E1 (16%), Group E2 (16%), and Group E3 (12%) was significantly lower than in Group P (60%), with Conclusions: This study showed that the application of 0.4 mg/kg esketamine in propofol-based sedation reduced the incidence of hypotension during colonoscopy while providing satisfactory sedation.

Indexed as

colonoscopyesketaminehypotensionpropofolsedation

Identifiers

PMID39314988
PMCPMC11418320

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.