ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2024
A GWAS of ACE Inhibitor-Induced Angioedema in a South African Population.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor-induced angioedema (AE-ACEI) is a life-threatening adverse event and, globally, the commonest cause of emergency presentations with angioedema. Several large genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have found genomic associations with AE-ACEI. However, despite African Americans having a 5-fold increased risk of AE-ACEI, there are no published GWAS from Africa. The aim of this study was to conduct a case-control GWAS of AE-ACEI in a South African population and perform a meta-analysis with an African American and European American population. Methods: The GWAS included 202 South African adults with a history of AE-ACEI and 513 controls without angioedema following angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) treatment for at least 2 years. A meta-analysis was conducted with GWAS summary statistics from an African American and European American cohort (from Vanderbilt/Marshfield with 174 cases and 489 controls). Results: No SNPs attained genome-wide significance. However, 26 SNPs in the post-imputation standard GWAS of the South African cohort and 37 SNPs in the meta-analysis were associated to AE-ACEI with suggestive threshold(p-value<5.0×10 Conclusions: Our results highlight the importance of African populations to detect novel variants in replication studies. Further increased sampling across the continent and matched functional work are needed to confirm the importance of genetic variation in understanding the biology of AE-ACEI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.