Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39314955›Full record

ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2024

Characterizing the Longitudinal Impact of Backward Locomotor Treadmill Training on Walking and Balance Outcomes in Chronic Stroke Survivors: A Randomized Single Center Clinical Trial.

Oluwole O Awosika, Colin Drury, Amanda Garver, Pierce Boyne, Heidi J Sucharew, Emily Wasik, Amit Bhattacharya, Kari Dunning, Pooja Khatri, Brett M Kissela

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Oluwole O AwosikaDepartment of Neurology and Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Cincinnati, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5286-931X
Colin DruryDepartment of Neurology and Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Cincinnati, USA.
Amanda GarverDepartment of Neurology and Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Cincinnati, USA.
Pierce BoyneDepartment of Rehabilitation, Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, College of Allied Health Sciences, University of Cincinnati; Cincinnati, OH, United States.
Heidi J SucharewDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Cincinnati; Cincinnati, OH, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-3933-1574
Emily WasikDepartment of Rehabilitation, Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, College of Allied Health Sciences, University of Cincinnati; Cincinnati, OH, United States.
Amit BhattacharyaEDDI Lab - Early Detection of Degenerative Disorders & Innovative Solutions, Department of Environmental Health, University of Cincinnati; Cincinnati, OH, United States.
Kari DunningDepartment of Rehabilitation, Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, College of Allied Health Sciences, University of Cincinnati; Cincinnati, OH, United States.
Pooja KhatriDepartment of Neurology and Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Cincinnati, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7344-8266
Brett M KisselaDepartment of Neurology and Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Cincinnati, USA.

Funding

High-Intensity Interval Training to Recover Walking Post-Stroke: HIT-Stroke Trial 2R01HD093694 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI · PI Pierce Boyne · 2018 to 2026
$6.1M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD093694
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Purpose: Walking and balance impairments after stroke are a global health concern, causing significant morbidity and mortality. However, effective strategies for achieving meaningful recovery in the chronic stages are limited. Backward locomotor treadmill training (BLTT) is a novel walking rehabilitation protocol that is safe, feasible, and likely beneficial in stroke survivors; however, its efficacy has not been tested. This single-center, randomized, assessor-blind clinical trial aims to test the preliminary efficacy of BLTT compared to forward locomotor treadmill training (FLTT) on walking speed, symmetry, and postural stability. Methods: Forty stroke survivors [BLTT (N=19), FLTT (N=21); mean age= 56.3 ± 8.6 years; 53% Female; 30% Non-Hispanic Black] with mild-moderate walking impairment were enrolled. Participants underwent nine 30-minute BLTT or FLTT sessions over three weeks. The primary outcome was the mean change in the 10-meter walk test (10 MWT) at 24 hours post-training (24 hr POST). Secondary outcome measures were changes in spatiotemporal walking symmetry and postural stability during quiet standing at 24 hr POST. Retention was explored at Days 30- and 90 POST. Results: We report clinically meaningful (≥ 0.16 m/s) improvements in overground walking speed at 24 hr POST, with retention up to Day 90 POST with BLTT and FLTT. However, contrary to our working hypothesis, no between-group differences in walking speed were observed. Nonetheless, we found that BLTT resulted in offline improvements in spatial symmetry and retention of subcomponents of the modified clinical test of sensory interaction on balance (mCTSIB), including the testing of proprio-vestibular integration up to Day 30 POST. Conclusion: Among chronic stroke patients with mild-moderate walking impairment, BLTT and FLTT both resulted in long-lasting and clinically meaningful improvement in walking speed. However, preliminary findings suggest that BLTT may better comprehensively target walking asymmetry and sensory systems processing and integration.

Indexed as

Backward WalkingBalanceGaitOutcome MeasuresPostural StabilitySensorineural IntegrationStrokeStroke RecoveryStroke RehabilitationWalking

Identifiers

PMID39314955
PMCPMC11419211

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.