ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2024
Safety and Outcomes of Valproic Acid in Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Patients: A Retrospective Study.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Purpose: Animal studies have suggested that valproic acid (VPA) is neuroprotective in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). Potential mechanisms include an effect on cortical spreading depolarizations (CSD), apoptosis, blood-brain barrier integrity, and inflammatory pathways. However, the effect of VPA on SAH outcomes in humans has not been investigated. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 123 patients with nontraumatic SAH. Eighty-seven patients had an aneurysmal source and 36 patients did not have a culprit lesion identified. We used stepwise logistic regression to determine the association between VPA and the following: delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI), radiographic vasospasm, and discharge modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score > 3. Results: All 18 patients who received VPA underwent coil embolization of their aneurysm. VPA use did not have a significant association with DCI on adjusted analysis (Odds Ratio, OR = 1.07, 95% CI: 0.20 - 5.80). The association between VPA use and vasospasm was OR = 0.64 (0.19 - 1.98) and discharge mRS > 3 was OR = 0.45 (0.10 - 1.64). Increased age (OR = 1.04, 1.01 - 1.07) and Hunt and Hess (HH) grade > 3 (OR = 14.5, 4.31 - 48.6) were associated with an increased likelihood for poor discharge outcome (mRS > 3). Younger age (OR = 0.96, 0.93 - 0.99), mFS score = 4 (OR = 4.14, 1.81 - 9.45), and HH grade > 3 (OR = 2.92, 1.11 - 7.69) were all associated with subsequent development of radiographic vasospasm. There were no complications associated with VPA administration. Conclusion: We did not observe an association between VPA and the rate of DCI. There may have been a protective association on discharge outcome and radiographic vasospasm that did not reach statistical significance. We found that VPA use was safe and is plausible to be used in a population of SAH patients who have undergone endovascular treatment of their aneurysm. Larger, prospective studies are needed to determine the effect of VPA on outcome after SAH.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.