ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2024
Perspective: on the future of fecal microbiota transplantation.
Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Fecal Microbiota Transplantation in Dogs and Cats: Evidence for Gastrointestinal and Emerging Extra-Intestinal Applications.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Review
- Gut microbiota and cancer immunotherapy: from dysbiosis to personalized immune checkpoint blockade optimization.Folia microbiologica · 2026Review
- Relationship Between Gut Microbiota and Cancer Neuro-Immunity.Microbial biotechnology · 2026Review
- Role of gut microbiota in melanosis coli: from anthraquinone biotransformation to mucosal homeostasis dysbiosis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- Exploring the microbial basis of postbiotic and paraprobiotic therapy in ulcerative colitis.Archives of microbiology · 2025Review
- The Potential Impact of Antibiotic Exposure on the Microbiome and Human Health.Microorganisms · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fecal Microbiota Transplantation (FMT) has shown to possess impressive potential benefit for a wide range of clinical indications. Due to its inherent safety issues and efficacy constraints, the use of personalized FMT analogs could be a promising avenue. The development of such analogs will require a detailed understanding of their functionality, encompassing not only microbe-host interactions of the microbial taxa that are involved, but also of the ecological dimensions of the analogs and an overview of the gastrointestinal sites where these relevant microbial interactions take place. Moreover, characterization of taxa that have been lost due to diminished exposure to beneficial microbes, as a consequence of Western lifestyle, may lead to creation of future FMT analogs with the capacity to restore functionalities that we have lost.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.