ArticlePalliative care and social practice2024
Progressing the Death Literacy Index: the development of a revised version (DLI-R) and a short format (DLI-9).
Article in Palliative care and social practice, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association between death literacy and life-sustaining treatment preferences in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing · 2026Article
- Death Literacy and End-of-Life Preparedness Among Health Professions Students: A Mixed-Methods Study.Cureus · 2026Article
- Death Literacy and Death Competence in Undergraduate Clinical and Allied Health Education: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study.JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
- Death literacy as relational capability: Pathways from social capital to emotional support.Palliative care and social practice · 2026Article
- Associations between sociodemographic factors, experience of death and dying, and death literacy: A nationally representative cross-sectional study.Palliative care and social practice · 2026Article
- Investigating effect versus impact in a participatory action research project: Building end-of-life communication competence in residential care facilities for older people.Palliative care and social practice · 2026Article
- Community participation and consultation in palliative and end-of-life care: Building death literacy through a participatory theory of change.Palliative care and social practice · 2026Article
- Changing contexts of death and dying: Influence of the COVID-19 pandemic and voluntary assisted dying legislation on death literacy in Australia.Palliative care and social practice · 2026Article
- Exploring death literacy with allied health professionals: A cross-sectional survey in Australia.Palliative care and social practice · 2026Article
- Strengthening death literacy in multicultural communities: Community-led interventions and cross-cultural validation of the Death Literacy Index.Palliative care and social practice · 2026Article
- Mapping death literacy in the East of England: A cross-sectional survey with qualitative insights to inform public health strategy.Palliative care and social practice · 2026Article
- Translation and validation of the revised and short forms of the Death Literacy Index in the Chinese population.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Development and validation of the Japanese version of the Death Literacy Index (DLI-J) and its short form (DLI-J-9).PCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences · 2025Article
- The impact of death literacy on self-management behaviors in gastric cancer patients: the chain mediating role of psychological adaptation and cognitive reappraisal.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Since the development of the Death Literacy Index (DLI) in 2019 in Australia, subsequent internationally validated versions have prompted rewording and refinement of the original survey questions. Use of the DLI in the community has also resulted in requests for a short format. Objectives: To examine and report on the psychometric properties of a revised version of the DLI-R and develop a short format DLI-9. Design: A cross-sectional national survey was conducted for the validation of the revised DLI. Methods: The DLI items were revised by the research team using the international literature. DLI data were collected from a representative online non-probability panel of 1202 Australian adults, based on age, gender, and geographical location. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was conducted to ensure the revised version (DLI-R) was consistent with the original. To develop a short format version of the DLI (DLI-9), items were first removed based on face validity, followed by an exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and CFA. The internal reliability of the DLI-R and the DLI-9 was assessed using Cronbach's alpha. The intraclass correlation coefficient was calculated to examine the inter-rater reliability between the DLI-R and DLI-9. Results: Twenty-four questions in the DLI were reworded for clarity. A CFA on the 29 items of this modified version of the DLI indicated a good model fit (Tucker-Lewis Index (TLI): 0.93; Comparative Fit Index (CFI): 0.93; root mean square of approximation (RMSEA): 0.06; standardized root mean residual (SRMR): 0.06), with six latent variables and an underlying latent variable "death literacy." For the DLI-9, an EFA identified a nine-item, two-factor structure model (DLI-9). A subsequent CFA in a separate sample demonstrated a good model fit for the DLI-9 (TLI: 0.92; CFI: 0.94; RMSEA: 0.089; SRMR: 0.07). Excellent inter-rater reliability (0.98) was observed between DLI-9 and DLI-R. Cronbach's alpha coefficients for DLI-R scales and subscales and the DLI-9 all exceeded 0.8, indicating high internal consistency. Conclusion: The DLI-R and the DLI-9 were found to have acceptable psychometric properties. The development of a shorter version of the DLI provides a valid measure of overall death literacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.