Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39314861›Full record

ArticleKidney medicine2024

Postpartum Renal Cortical Necrosis: A Case Series.

Lei Jiang, Suxia Wang, Ying Tan, Tao Su

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Kidney medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lei JiangRenal Division, Department of Medicine, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Suxia WangRenal Pathology Center, Institute of Nephrology, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Ying TanRenal Division, Department of Medicine, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Tao SuRenal Division, Department of Medicine, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rationale & Objective: Postpartum renal cortical necrosis (postpartum RCN) is a severe form of obstetric acute kidney injury. This study aimed to identify clinicopathologic features in Chinese postpartum RCN cases to determine how pathologic findings may contribute to the treatment and prognosis. Study Design: Single-center, case series. Setting & Participants: Twelve patients with postpartum RCN had kidney biopsies at Peking University First Hospital between 2014 and 2021. The diagnosis of postpartum RCN was made according to typical magnetic resonance imaging or pathologic features. Clinical, laboratory, and pathologic data were compared between patients with estimated glomerular filtration rate <30 (poor outcome) and ≥30 mL/min/1.73 m Observations: All patients with postpartum RCN presented with stage 3 acute kidney injury attributed to a probable atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome. Pregnancy terminations occurred at a median gestational age of 35.5 weeks. Kidney biopsy was performed from 18 days to 4 months from delivery. On biopsy, hemoglobin, platelet count, and lactate dehydrogenase levels had been restored to 137 g/L, 214 × 10 Limitations: Limited sample size and retrospective design. Conclusions: We identified key pathologic features in patients with postpartum RCN and atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome, highlighting the necessity for more effective therapeutic options. There is a clear demand for noninvasive biomarkers that can accurately track disease progression and inform treatment duration for long-term outcomes improvement.

Indexed as

Acute kidney injuryatypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS)pathologypostpartumrenal cortical necrosissegmental sclerosis

Identifiers

PMID39314861
PMCPMC11417324

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.