ArticleBiological imaging2024
Reconstructing interpretable features in computational super-resolution microscopy via regularized latent search.
Article in Biological imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Supervised deep learning approaches can artificially increase the resolution of microscopy images by learning a mapping between two image resolutions or modalities. However, such methods often require a large set of hard-to-get low-res/high-res image pairs and produce synthetic images with a moderate increase in resolution. Conversely, recent methods based on generative adversarial network (GAN) latent search offered a drastic increase in resolution without the need of paired images. However, they offer limited reconstruction of the high-resolution (HR) image interpretable features. Here, we propose a robust super-resolution (SR) method based on regularized latent search (RLS) that offers an actionable balance between fidelity to the ground truth (GT) and realism of the recovered image given a distribution prior. The latter allows to split the analysis of a low-resolution (LR) image into a computational SR task performed by deep learning followed by a quantification task performed by a handcrafted algorithm based on interpretable biological features. This two-step process holds potential for various applications such as diagnostics on mobile devices, where the main aim is not to recover the HR details of a specific sample but rather to obtain HR images that preserve explainable and quantifiable differences between conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.